this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
346 points (86.5% liked)

memes

14002 readers
1911 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] brunogron@feddit.nu 14 points 1 year ago

For that to be true it would have to say 0.25 / 2.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

X/0.5 = X*2

Division by less than 1 is essentially multiplying with extra steps

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, thanks for the insight. I've never been able to get my head around weird division like this, and that sounds like a great rule of thumb for thinking about it.

[–] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dividing by a fraction is the same as flipping one it on its head and multiplying it.

0.25/0.5 is (1/4)/(1/2)

To multiply it we'd flip one, either works but for this example I decided to flip the second one: (1/4) * (2/1)

The top half of the fractions (numerators) multiply together, then the bottoms (denominators) multiply together. (1*2)/(4*1) = 2/4 which reduces to 1/2

[–] drengbarazi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

same as x * .5 = .25 if that somehow helps ya

I suspect people might be getting confused by this because of colloquialisms like "divided in half", "divided in the middle", "divided by two"

things is, math doesn't care about idioms

another area in mathematics that I've seen ppl (myself included lmao) suffer from this is propositional logic. like with the non exclusive nature of the OR operator

but this is all just a wild guess

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely struggle with any math that I can't visualize in a physical way.

[–] jimmux@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes it clicks if you graph it out with the confusing values on axes.