Technology

59578 readers

5347 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

842

The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 8 months ago by smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world

154 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Eli5, what are the security risks of my HDMI cable?

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 83 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Piracy being easier is the only risk. Once again ruining the experience of legitimate customers to try and stop a thing that they have had no success at even slowing down.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Even further, it made it more expensive to buy products from all the dumb licensing fees that all the middlemen try to shoehorn in.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

The security of mega Corp IP.

[–] Eideen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

HDMI 2.1cspecs are closed source.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago

Having to use systems that swing to more closed solutions is going to degrade security in more places.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

First thing I could think of is taking advantage of the ARC to spy on you.