this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
180 points (97.4% liked)

World News

36793 readers
489 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why? What's wrong with safe, managed and fast languages?

[–] zik@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Java's runtime has had a large number of CVEs in the last few years, so that's probably a decent reason to be concerned.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Yep but:

  • it's one runtime, so patching a CVE patches it for all programs (vs patching each and every program individually)

  • graalvm is taking care of enabling java to run on java

[–] DampCanary@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Nothing...

Only that descrition doesn't include Java

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing really, the JVM has a pretty troubled history that would really make me hesitate to call it "safe". It was originally built before anyone gave much thought to security and that fact plauges it to the present day.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

and how much of this troubled history is linked to Java Applets/native browsers extensions, and how much of it is relevant today?

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between writing code on a well-tested and broadly used platform implemented in C++ vs. writing new C++.