this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
662 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
662
Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’ (nypost.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
246 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’::These stylish shades may look like a regular pair of Ray-Ban Wayfarers, but they're actually Meta's new Smart Glasses, complete with two tiny cameras and speakers implanted in the arms. The wearable tech was unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg Wednesday at the 2023 Meta Connect conference in Menlo Park, California, sparking a frenzy online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The bar is a public place in that they allow in the public. You have no expectation of privacy there.

However the bar owner as the owner can explicitly ban photography and that’s fine it’s their bar , but they have to explicitly let people know the rules.

You ever been to a bar or a club? People are talking photos everywhere lol

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Point of clarification. It's not "public" in the legal sense. Might be why you're catching some downvotes. The rest of it is pretty much on point.

[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the clarification.

Perhaps my wording was poor but I’m not sure why people don’t realise that not all places the public go are public so in those places the rules are set up by the owner.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you ever been to a theater? Taking photos is banned despite allowing in the public. Please explain.

[–] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Again. The theatre owners set the rules.

The same as your bar example. If you owned a building or business then you can set the rules or make people leave.