this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Unixporn

15444 readers
3 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No Defaults
  3. Busy Screenshots
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW
  7. No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have hopped again, back to Arch this time

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Joltey@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda weird to have one of the hardest most customisable distros and choose one of the easiest to use, least customisable desktops

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The whole point is the freedom of choice. I don't use Arch because it's "one of the hardest most customisable distros", but because it's rolling release, I like pacman as a package manager, and the AUR is a great resource. I used Ubuntu with bspwm and Arch with Gnome, and there's nothing wrong with either of those setups. It's all Linux in the end. Most of the differences between distros (for most "traditional" distros, at least) boil down to the install process, the init system, a set of default configurations/packages, and the package manager.

Don't play gatekeepers, please. It's dumb, nobody asked you to do it, your opinion is just that, and it's exactly this type of community behavior that turns people away from Linux. Thanks.