this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
743 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2818 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gretchen Whitmer responds to calls by some Democrats to vote ‘uncommitted’ in Michigan’s primary on Tuesday

Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan governor, pushed back on calls to not vote for Joe Biden over his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying on Sunday that could help Trump get re-elected.

“It’s important not to lose sight of the fact that any vote that’s not cast for Joe Biden supports a second Trump term,” she said on Sunday during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. “A second Trump term would be devastating. Not just on fundamental rights, not just on our democracy here at home, but also when it comes to foreign policy. This was a man who promoted a Muslim ban.”

Whitmer, who is a co-chair of Biden’s 2024 campaign, also said she wasn’t sure what to expect when it came to the protest vote.

Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who is the only Palestinian-American serving in Congress, urged Democrats last week to vote “uncommitted” in Michigan’s 27 February primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The problem is Progressives aren’t offering up any other option. Who am I supposed to vote FOR this time around? “No one” isn’t much of a rallying cry.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Why should they? the DNC will never allow a progressive to be the party candidate. which is why we didn't have bernie in '16... like the VOTERS WANTED.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would say 2020 was the real stinger... clyburn in south carolina playing king maker.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

New Hampshire went for Sanders in 2020, and were punished by losing their primary representation in 2024. South Carolina proved pivotal to the Biden campaign, so they're rewarded by going first.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

Yuuuup. There were plenty of better states to choose if they just wanted a less-white state. Georgia is diverse and actually in play, but instead we kick off with a state that's deep red with an ineffectual Democratic party because they voted the way the winners liked.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Because in 2020 the progressive candidate was the front runner. 4 years later they have no one else to offer up? No wants to vote for Biden. This is the progressive caucus’s moment, and they’re failing to respond to what the voters want.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The progressive caucus fell apart the last couple years. Even Fetterman has started towing the line.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then to be quite honest that’s something progressives need to focus on and work through if they want to be taken seriously going forward. Railing against Biden will only get them so far. At the end of the day, voters need something to be in favor of, to rally behind.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Agree completely, which is why I hope more progressives keep running for local offices

[–] Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Progressivism is a marble on a hill. Either they roll to the right and join the liberals because they support and believe in an unjust hierarchical system as long as it's sufficiently pinkwashed or roll hard left because they see the issue is the system itself

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The hill ima die on: sortition

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

If progressives had put someone up against an incumbent they would have been accused of wanting Trump to win.

Also, their candidate would be deemed unelectable and voting for them in the primary would be helping Trump to win.

Also, America is not a progressive country and even if they won the nomination they'd probably lose.

Why? Because America wants this shitshow. Why else would they keep choosing it? They don't want problems solved, they want arguments and hot takes and "slams" and "bashes."

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

There are great progressive candidates running. You just don’t see it because the DNC is hard at work behind the scenes canceling primaries, removing candidates from the ballot, instructing the corporate media to not report on it, and sending out people like Whitmer to manufacture consent for there being no actual primary debates or competition.

Biden’s ego demands a second term, there’s no voter choice involved here.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

If the voters wanted Bernie in '16, they could have gotten off of their collective asses and voted for him. He was on every single state ballot. The fact is, more voters voted for Hillary.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I cannot remember an election where the incumbent got primaried. And even if we tried we’d be accused of hurting the establishment candidate’s chances in the general.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Dem olds in Congress were not happy to see AOC stomp on Crowley (10 term incumbent) back in '18 (I think).

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

You have to know that’s not comparable to a presidential election

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

And that's why they pulled out all the stops to block Cisneros and support anti-choice NRA stooge Cuellar.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

Eric Cantor but that’s not exactly a 1:1 comparison.