Science

17293 readers

20 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

And the side effects are rare and statistically pose less risk than being unvaccinated and contracting the actual virus.

How is this news?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it's important to check up on previously made estimations and see how well they hold up.

Might result in "oh shit, we missed something important" or "good to know we were right, now we have an even better foundation for the next studies"

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Oh absolutely, but as a news item it's a little uneventful.

On the other hand, I suppose it's good to know that the scientific process is still there, ticking away in the background.