this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
93 points (92.7% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
587 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
93
Poilievre says 'biological males' should be banned from women's sports, change rooms and bathrooms (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 9 months ago by wise_pancake@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre stepped into the debate over trans rights on Wednesday, saying "biological males" should be banned from women's sports, change rooms and bathrooms.

"Female spaces should be exclusively for females, not for biological males," Poilievre said in Kitchener, Ont.

The Conservative leader made the comments after being asked if, as prime minister, he would introduce legislation to prevent "transgender women" or "biological men" from participating in female sports or entering female prisons and shelters.

"A lot of the spaces … are provincially and municipally controlled, so it is unclear ... what reach federal legislation would have to change them," Poilievre said.

"But obviously female sports, female change rooms, female bathrooms should be for females, not for biological males," he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why do Conservatives have to live their entire lives finding new groups of people to hate for no good reason?

Because they hate themselves.

It's like they all have a bully complex, but failed to outgrow being that 12-year-old jackass in elementary school.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think that's too convenient and loaded an explanation. I suspect a better one can be found in social identity theory, with positions like these being social markers that they use to establish firm boundaries around their in-group. Every group tends to develop social markers, things you're expected to believe or otherwise exhibit to show that you're "on their side." There may be some particular reason why any given marker first shows up, but once it gets adopted it becomes essentially self-perpetuating.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would believe that only if these people say/do horrible things while in their group.

The reality is, they are just as hateful in private as they are in public.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Social markers are usually not a conscious thing. Once it becomes part of the "this is the way a proper person behaves" ruleset it gets internalized.