this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
756 points (86.5% liked)

memes

10405 readers
1802 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Things have gotten better and progress has been made from times past, it just seems worse now because we have more access to information. We've come far, and have further to go!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The average American didn't die at age 51. And, while the average life expectancy might have been 51 years, that's a Spiders Georg moment.

The life expectancy was thrown off by all the child mortality. If you lived past 10 years, you were likely to live to 70.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2625386/

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Yep, and now there's not a deluge of dead children dragging the average down, which is objectively pretty great

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Look, I feel like "children dead before 10" is a pretty upsetting and relevant statistic.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry the Anti-Vax movement is looking to bring back those numbers!

[–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have noticed lately people on the Internet starting sentences more with "Look." Is it just me or is this becoming more of a trend? (Not trying to judge or anything, just wondering if I am going crazy)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

I start with look or listen a lot, idk why

[–] droans@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah if I had to choose how to bump up the life expectancy, reducing child mortality would definitely be my first choice.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's not the same as 25 years old being mid-life.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like you're just excited to share a fact about a common misconception rather than actually paying attention to what's being said. Infant mortality is still a bad thing. While it's true folks lived about as long less infant mortality is still a net improvement.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I'm paying attention. I feel like you just want to point out that it's a common misconception rather than engage with the fact that dying at 51 is very different from child mortality.

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct; "average" and average can be different things.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, in particular the "average age of death" might be 51 if the average includes a lot of people who died as children. OTOH, the average person dying at 51 is fundamentally different in how you think of it.

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Life expectancy at, is used by academics when relevant. Average at birth, adulthood and even once they're over the hill have utility. Like identifying outliers.

Regardless, the average person is going to use average as a nebulas concept occasionally informed by science but hearsay and superstition on an average day.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago