1059
AI companies are violating a basic social contract of the web and and ignoring robots.txt
(www.theverge.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
1059 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
59666 readers
2889 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They would be less obnoxious if used sparingly, but they wouldn't be effective unless the reason why they're used changed, from graphical echo ("I saw a cat today π±") and mood/attitude particles (like you did) to ideographic usage (e.g. "I saw a π± today"). Plus they're still colourful and attention-grabbing drawings within text, they detract attention from the text itself.
Canβt distractions from the text sometimes be exactly what you want?
And have you seen an emoji perfectly complete a meme when being used for mood? How about convey lighthearted intent when discussing a serious subject?
They can but most of the time they aren't. That's the key here: most of the time emojis only add noise, to the point that the shreds of legitimate usage (that can be conveyed through other means) don't really justify keeping the cons of the noise.
It isn't like anyone would implement my idea though. I'm mostly doing like that old man screaming at the sky, or something like this.
π΄π£οΈπ£π
What is the point that you're trying to convey by relexing "old man screaming at the sky" to use emojis?
If the point is that "they could be used to convey meaning": I've already addressed it. Usually, they aren't. (If the point is something else, please clarify.)
Wouldnβt you agree the perfect reply to:
β¦is a string of emoji? :)
If that was my point, it would be a great answer.
However my point is not against the usage of emojis to convey linguistic meaning, like that. (It's a bit pointless, but at least you're saying something through the emojis.)
Are you a linguist? Fabulous descriptive capabilities you have there.
Well of the three usages:
graphical echo ("I saw a cat today π±")
mood/attitude particles (βI wish I were just a cat πβ)
ideographic usage ("I saw a π± today")
The echo is almost certainly the least useful.
When overused gratuitously, it can be funny (NSFW examples included)!
That overuse feels a lot like a fourth category. It's almost meta-, as if using emojis to parody emoji usage!
I'm not sure if it's usage for echo or as mood particles makes me roll my eyes the most. Perhaps echo, too.
More like "ability to remember vocab from uni times" (My second grad included Linguistics, although I don't work on the field nowadays.)