this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
963 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual -- this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pedos are going to pedo, but if you only recruit from an audience of people that are actively trying to avoid romantic adult relationships, I imagine going to have a higher percentage of pedos in that group.

By allowing priests to marry, be LGBTQ+, etc, you’re going to have fewer open seats at the alter for pedos.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would even challenge that pedos are going to pedo. Obviously there's no research on this, but are pedos only attracted to children? Are all pedophiles also rapists? I find that hard to believe. I think that "child molesting priests" are an intersection of priest, pedophile, rapist, and sexually frustrated.

[–] Kase@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If the wikipedia page is accurate: some pedophiles are only attracted to children ("exclusive pedophiles), but some are also attracted to adults; and not all pedophiles commit rape.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, to me this is just common sense.

[–] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

My bad, thought you were genuinely asking

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, not all pedophile are rapist but almost all consume materials that were produced by raping children. One problem is that there are only a few programs that actually targeting helping pedophiles to deal with their condition. So we leave them on their own to figure out how to deal with their condition.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Big [ citation needed ] there that triggers my BS sensors. CP is a huge problem but it's literally impossible to know if "most consume materials" like that. Not defending pedophiles in any form, but hate bad logic.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That was my impression - might be wrong. I will check up on it.

EDIT:

Seems also inconclusive, since it's a difficult topic to research:

"In summary, child and/or adult pornography is a feature in the lives of many pedophiles and other sex offenders, just as it is a feature in the lives of some persons who do not commit sexual offences. Alternatively, some sex offenders do not use pornography of any kind. "

https://publications.gc.ca/site/archivee-archived.html?url=https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/jus/J3-2-2000-5E.pdf

Maybe there is newer research you are aware of.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

but almost all consume materials that were produced by raping children.

So what's your take on lolicon?

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Depends on if it's more a substitute or a trigger. I personally don't know of any conclusive research on this topic. But people consuming lolicon defenetly need psychological help, don't think it's a healthy fantasy no matter how to look on it.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Troubles reading?