Technology

59578 readers

3661 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

616

Google workers complain bosses are 'inept' and 'glassy-eyed' (www.sfgate.com)

submitted 9 months ago by 1984@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world

148 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

IMO one thing I think should be made into law is that if a company grants unvested equity, everything granted will automatically vest when you get laid off.

If you decide to quit before they vest, I understand that those grants should be forfeited. If you get fired for not doing your job, I also get forfeiting them.

But if the company lays you off, that's on their side, so I think the opposite (automatic vesting) should be guaranteed by law.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

I had to verify the current situation in the United States is what you stated because it's intuitively so wrong. I can't believe an employer can set terms for compensation and, through no fault of the employee, legally prevent that employee from completing those terms.

Land of the free!

[–] coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, my company just re-organized their shares and reset my vesting schedule after 5 years. And are trying to get rid of me.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Reset the schedule for shares they already granted you? Or for future grants?

[–] coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ones they already granted me

[–] moormaan@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a signed agreement with them on the original schedule? I don't think it's legal for them to unilaterally change that agreement.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Don't know anything about their case, but an acquaintance of mine works for a company that got bought and their vests just evaporated the moment the company changed hands ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] moormaan@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Ouch

[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Illegal. Sue them.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

I wonder if that depends on the jurisdiction, but I'll ask if that's possible