Privacy

32159 readers

614 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

672

UK Gvmt Say Mask Wearing At Protests Will Soon Be Illegal (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 9 months ago by leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Protesters who wear masks could face arrest, up to a month in jail and a £1,000 fine under proposed measures that human rights campaigners claim are pandering to “culture war nonsense”.

Police in England and Wales will be given the power to arrest people if they are wearing face coverings at specific demonstrations, the Home Office has said."

Been a bad 18 months or so for privacy in the UK. Online Safety Bill passed, the right to take strike action curtailed, people in receipt of benefits (including disabled people) will soon (as from 2025) have their bank accounts open to the government, the right to protest curtailed and now this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Face paint.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Face paint it is.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget to import you some Faygo.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

As someone who used to run in the juggalo crowd, idk man Faygo is perfect for some bigger scale resistence bullshit haha

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You bring up a good point. What qualifies as a mask? Do fake beards and mustaches count? What about religious face coverings? What about people who have prosthetic noses? I have a feeling this is going to be a tricky one for them to enforce in any sort of reasonable way.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

A big thing you can hide is the distance between your eyes. Cover one of them with hair or something and any FR tech won't work as well. You could also have a bunch of infrared led's on your hat or something then the camera wouldn't see shit. There's a video out there that's an interview with an ex-CIA agent or something that talks about disguises and whatnot.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

large image

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't affect facial recognition tech, which I think is why this passed

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are designs for face paint specifically to defeat facial recognition.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago

There are designs for face paint that try to defeat some shitty facial recognition systems. That shit isn't going to work with tech paid for with Police budgets