this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
1623 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
2719 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
1623
dotnet developer (programming.dev)
submitted 9 months ago by JPDev@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

some legacy software checked if the OS name began with "Windows 9" to differentiate between 95 and future versions.

This is a myth. Windows doesn't even have an API to give you the marketing name of the OS. Internally, Windows 95 is version 4.0 and Windows 98 is 4.1. The API to get the version returns the major and minor version separately, so to check for Windows 95 you'd check if majorVersion = 4 and minorVersion = 0.

Edit: This is the return type from the API: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winnt/ns-winnt-osversioninfoexa

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's a myth, but it sure sounds plausible. The software that checks the "Windows 9" substring doesn't even have to exist for this to be reason they chose to skip to version 10 — they just had to be concerned that it might exist.

Sure, maybe there's no C function that returns the string, but there's a ver command. It would be trivial to shell out to the command. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ver_(command)

This doesn't prove anything, but there are a TON of examples of code that checks for the substring. It's not hard to imagine that code written circa 2000 would not be future proof. https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+%22%5C%22windows+9%5C%22%22&patternType=keyword&sm=0

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

but there are a TON of examples of code that checks for the substring

oh

oh no

There's code in the JDK that does that??

I really wish I didn't see that.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yup!! Never look under the hood in software, you'll just be disappointed ☹️

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've been a software developer for 20 years and this comment is too real. Some days I'm amazed that any software even works at all.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Having worked in both food service and software, I encourage you not to visit the kitchen of any restaurants you enjoy either.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Please don't show me how the sausage is made