this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
205 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The dispute comes from Colorado — but it could have national implications for Trump and his political fate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

At what point does the U.S.A need to start amending the constitution? I'll bet within in the next 20 years, they'll have to be serious amendments. Soon as the Boomer generation starts to lose politically. The U.S.A. seems to be in a holding pattern at the moment.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We can't while the Republicans control most of the states. Today we are far more likely to codify abortion bans, racism, and assignment of guns to every child born.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah a constitutional convention would be an absolute nightmare at this point.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The problem is that there’s a lot of power held by people who are dedicated to acting in bad faith

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't happen with current divisions.

An amendment starts with 290 votes in the House and they can BARELY get a 218 vote simple majority.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And thats even before you have to convince X number of GOP controlled statehouses to ratify something.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yup.

290 in the House that can't reliably produce a 218 simple majority.

67 in the Senate that can't get 60 to over-ride a filibuster.

Then you need ratification by 38 states. In 2020, Biden won 25 + DC, Trump won 25.

So to get ratification on any hot button issue, you need ALL of the states on "your" side + 13 states from the "other" side.

Want to get rid of guns? Go ahead, find 13 red states who will agree, I'll wait. Hell, out of the 25 blue states, only 19 have Democratic state houses, so you'll likely lose 6 there too... now you need 19 red states and good luck with that.

Flip it around, want to ban abortion? Maybe you can get all 25 red states + the 6 blue states with Republican state houses, you're still 7 short. Good luck getting Washington/Oregon/California/Hawaii on board...