this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
1623 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
2719 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Say whatever you want about Microsoft, but they don't mess around with backwards compatibility.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It’s easy to be backwards compatible when you’re backwards in general.

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I once heard some YouTuber say Windows uses \ in path names instead of / like everyone else because Microsoft thinks backwards.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As what often happens, using \ for paths is for backwards compatibility.

Neither CP/M nor MS-DOS 1.0 had folders. When folders were added in MS-DOS 2.0, the syntax had to be backwards compatible. DOS already used forward slashes for command-line options (e.g. DIR /W) so using them for folders would have been ambiguous - does that DIR command have a /W option, or is it viewing the contents of the W directory at the root of the drive? Backslashes weren't used for anything so they used them for folders.

This is the same reason why you can't create files with device names like con, lpt1, and so on. DOS 2.0 has to retain backwards compatibility with 1.0 where you could do something like TYPE foo.txt > LPT1 to send a document to a printer. The device names are reserved globally so they can work regardless of what folder you're in.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Well, better to be backwards with backwards compatibility than to just be backwards.

looks at Apple