Technology

59674 readers

3229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

433

Cory Doctorow wants to wipe away enshittification of tech (www.theregister.com)

submitted 10 months ago by will_a113@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Doctrow argues that nascent tech unionization (which we're closer to having now than ever before) combined with bipartisan fear (and consequent regulation) either directly or via agencies like the FTC and FCC can help to curb Big Tech's power, and the enshittification that it has wrought.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Regarding UBI, the counter argument is that if companies like Walmart paid scraps for hard work, it would allow people to simply leave.

Leave for what? another minimum wage job? UBI is just a subsidy for corporations. Businessmen like Andrew Yang promoted it to confuse the discussion around increasing minimum wage. And it worked... minimum wage was not increased.

I believe we should do both. This “waiting for the right moment” or “focus on one thing only” can be a fallacy, imho, that leads to well polished counters from reactionaries and less motivation in supporters.

There is such a thing as political capital. Bernie Sanders has the right idea, keep talking about the 1%, keep talking about raising taxes on the wealthy, keep talking about raising minimum wage to build support for these policies.

I think having more space hippie ideas will inspire many more people than boring minimum wage or tax increase fights

It will inspire more opposition. "See this is what those hippies want, are you going to vote for that?"

Having people divided on various single issue groups that want different policies means no on gets anything. Taxing the rich and raising minimum wage is boring because it works. Experiments are fun because you don't know whether it will work or not. But when an economic policy doesn't work, it negatively impacts people's lives.

It's feasible to get people to agree on taxing the rich. It's feasible to get people to agree to increase minimum wage. But if we're busy debating planting gardens or whatever, we aren't going to debating the things that we can win on.

[–] cygon@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Leave for nothing if UBI is high enough. Otherwise, couch-surf. Temporarily move to a shared house. Or just have a few months extra to hunt for a job without getting evicted.

I think we just have to disagree on whether a vast cloud of progressive ideas or total focus on one or two realistic ideas is better.

My belief is that it helps. That opposition is good. Let them waste all their ammo, let them help spread the message, let them get the impression that there are so many progressive demands that it shifts the general tone. Some ideas or aspects of ideas will stick, even with the opposition.

And while they're fighting hippie space pirates, we'll pass an automatic minimum wage adjustment. Progressives have been on the defense far too long. I want a new 1968 :)

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

The problem with UBI is it isn't going to address a lot problems around people being unable to work because of physical or mental health issues. You need a welfare system to addresses those issues.

So with higher minimum wage, an unemployment insurance program, and a welfare system, what's the point of UBI? It doesn't fulfill the needs that existing systems do when properly funded and updated for inflation. It's really just a subsidy to companies that don't want to pay their employees well. This is why guys like Andrew Yang want it. And there's a lot of people out there that want it because who doesn't want to get a monthly check from the government? And people are generally attracted to these "one weird trick to fix the economy, economists hate him!" kind of policies.

But the reality is that economics isn't simple, there are no quick fixes. There are people with different needs so there needs to be different programs to fulfill those needs. Someone with a health condition isn't going to survive off of a small amount of money and couch surfing. Someone who has a well paying job and lives in a place that has high rent or mortgage payments then suddenly finds themself unemployed isn't going to be able to pay their bills with UBI.

So UBI is just an excuse to scrap necessary welfare programs, and not raise minimum wage. Couch surfing isn't a solution to housing problems. There's only so many couches and eventually you end up with homelessness.