this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
13 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32348 readers
421 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Zelenskyy tried to surrender and Boris Johnson stopped him?! Ooooookay… He maaaybe (all “unnamed” sources) expressed an opinion, which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

To cast that as “Ukraine was stopped from surrendering” is just obscene … and yet another Kremlin talking point.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

If the UK is convinced that you can't negotiate with dictators, how does the UK keep entering into arms sales agreements with Saudi Arabia? Do the contracts just appear out of thin air at BAE?

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Sigh.

I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries. We had plenty of relations with Russia before they decided to invade Ukraine and they were a dictatorship before. We have plenty of relationships with China now and they are a de facto dictatorship.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries

Yemen isn't a country because it isn't white enough for you

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Saudis used their British weapons to bomb Yemen and create one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in recent memory. The UK sold weapons to Saudi before, during, and after the Saudi involvement in Yemen.

Perhaps Russia should have merely bombed Ukraine to the point of starvation. Then they'd be a good dictatorship that the UK would be happy to carry out business negotiations with.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't be ridiculous

Ukrainians are white

That's only acceptable when it's brown, asian, or south american people who's country you're destroying.

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Temporarily white mind you. They will be presented as unwashed asiatic slavic hordes soon enough by the western press, unfortunately.

Such trends and anti-ukranian xenophobia are already strongly devolping in Poland.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

What’s going on in Yemen is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Saudi Arabia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Saudi is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What’s going on in Ukraine is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Russia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Russia is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Russians' aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent American influence from growing and to suppress violent Neo-Nazi extremism.

[–] ToxicDivinity@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every lib's real values: white people invaded=the good guys

Brown/Black people invaded=it's complicated us-foreign-policy

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahh that's why Russia used the Wagner group

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think sending a nazi-ish mercenarygroup into the meat grinder against an even more nazi-ish group so that they both wipe each other out (like what happened in Bahkmut) is good actually

[–] HornyOnMain@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country

hitler-detector

When I started reading this thread I really did not expect you to start defending Saudi Arabia to own the tankies ngl

[–] Flaps@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did say saudis bad tho, we should give the same nuance we expect from others. I don't suppose the commenter you're replying to supports Saudi arabia, it's just odd that the nuance they're seemingly willing to grant the saudis wont be given to Russia

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Restored order" is such a bullshit line

[–] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's basically the same line Russia is using in Ukraine. Just with some added "denazification" buzz words.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, Ukraine has a specific military campaign (the bombardment of Donbas) that he opposes along with the expansion of NATO. He has very clear demands, whatever you think of them.

[–] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was initiated by pro-Russian insurgents and has led to lots of death on both sides. It's not like the opposing forces haven't been bombarding either. It's like if England started attacking the North during the US Civil War because they retaliated against the South attacking them, and of course they both speak English. I'm guessing you also believe in the Russian propaganda line about a genocide happening there, even though there's no proof? It was obviously just an excuse for Russia to get more control over Ukrainian territory after their Russian puppet President got ran out of the country.

Putin had denazification as a demand. That's not super clear at all. His clear demands are Ukraine staying out of NATO, which it was already up for agreeing to do, and surrendering territory, which is obviously the one it doesn't want to do, because no country would want to do that. That's the problem one but hopefully they come to something eventually.

It's bizarre to me that most hexbear users are less anti-war than some protestors and TV journalists that live in Russia itself who want their own country to leave. I agree with you guys on so many other stuff, but I can't get behind supporting the aggressor in a war, especially as they're shelling hospitals and apartment buildings.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

The Donbas secessionists want to leave because the Maidan coup started pushing the country towards Ukrainian ethnonationalism, and eastern Ukraine is very Russian. Russia did back them, but Putin did not fabricate a popular opposition to the Maidan government.

Denazification is a pretty clear objective when the entity that you are seeking to denazify has battalions that are openly and explicitly Nazi as part of their doctrine. Purge those units, prosecute former members, ban Nazi hate crimes (like greasing bullets with pig fat) and ban Nazi symbols like Swastikas and Wolfsangles. It's really not difficult, the US military nearly passes that bar and even the German military does (though it has closeted Nazi cliques).

to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

Lol, Iran is more moderate than Saudi Arabia and bombing and starving populations is how you create radicals.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you think somehow the Ukraine situation is cut and dry?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The NYT said that one is simple!

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ahh, well then, if they said so

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

"Restoring order is when you bomb hospitals and exacerbate famines and the more people that die, the more order it is."

The Saudis are committing genocide in Yemen. No ifs, no buts. To claim they have a good reason to be out there doing it is genocide apologia.

the saudis make a desert and call it peace

prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

yeah the saudis are really worried about Islamic fundamentalism

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Holy shit man just realize you have no ideology or clue, stop talking and educate yourself on what the actual fuck is going on in the world. It would be a far more productive use of your time.

[–] Flaps@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Incredible self-own

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LIB s love doing the "its complicated... [handwaving about all sides are bad] ...so i support the US position" take

[–] Stylistillusional@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When it's the US/West doing something there's all this room for 'nuance' but when it is Bad Country it's suddenly clear-cut good vs evil.

[–] Bnova@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

You're not very smart.

[–] Gelamzer@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ironic that you accuse others of reapting Kremlin talking points while vomiting the most generic pro Nato shit

[–] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

They get their opinions straight from the white house and brussels.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Russia and Ukraine may have agreed on a tentative deal to end the war in April, according to a recent piece in Foreign Affairs.

“Russian and Ukrainian negotiators appeared to have tentatively agreed on the outlines of a negotiated interim settlement,” wrote Fiona Hill and Angela Stent. “Russia would withdraw to its position on February 23, when it controlled part of the Donbas region and all of Crimea, and in exchange, Ukraine would promise not to seek NATO membership and instead receive security guarantees from a number of countries.”

The news highlights the impact of former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s efforts to stop negotiations, as journalist Branko Marcetic noted on Twitter. The decision to scuttle the deal coincided with Johnson’s April visit to Kyiv, during which he reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to break off talks with Russia for two key reasons: Putin cannot be negotiated with, and the West isn’t ready for the war to end.

Foreign Affairs is a Kremlin propaganda outlet now?

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Foreign Affairs is certainly propaganda, just not of the Kremlin variety.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol exactly, it's the last place you'd expect to find anything challenging the U.S. narrative.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

Considering there's people in this thread complaining were spreading Russian propaganda by posting a press release FROM UKRAINE I'm starting to think their accusations may not be entirely in good faith.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Reportedly” means “others report”.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Johnson’s April visit to Kyiv, during which he reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to break off talks with Russia

Hmm let's look at the source on that: Ukrainska Pravda, a Ukranian language paper headquartered in Kyiv, owned by a Ukranian investment company also headquartered in Kyiv.

Kremlin propaganda!

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Sigh.

You do understand how propaganda works, right? It works by zooming in on molehills until they appear like mountains. So while I wouldn’t rule out that Johnson the Idiot said something unwise to Zelensky government, I also don’t automatically think that it means Zelenski was “forced to not give up”.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sigh

farquaad-point redditor!

I also don’t automatically think that it means Zelenski was “forced to not give up”.

  1. Ukraine negotiates ceasefire.
  2. BJ tells Ukraine to not go through with it.
  3. Ukraine does not go through with it.

Why else would Ukraine have reversed course if not for one of its NATO puppetmasters commanding it to? Either it's that, or BJ making a really impassioned argument for sending a bunch of Ukranians to an early grave and Zelensky fell for it, or Zelensky just changed his mind all on his own and the timing is a pure coincidence.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What leverage exactly do you think Johnson had over Ukraine? He hasn’t even got leverage over his toilet seat.

[–] Annakah69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ukraine has the most corrupt state in the world, the UK has a shit load of money.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Fuck you're not even sighing anymore, you're really invested now, aren't you?
Also nice goalpost movement, you're a dickhead

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

You are not immune to propaganda.
Who gives a shit what you "wouldn't rule out" when even western media goes against you? Get your head out of your ass

[–] ToxicDivinity@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Heavens to Betsy sigh

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Oh fuck lmao, it’s a bot! It all makes sense now

Okay, but it is literally a propaganda source that is aligned with Ukraine lmao. We know it is propaganda, we are presenting it because even the ukrainian propaganda acknowledges it as factual.