this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
374 points (96.5% liked)

Open Source

31365 readers
174 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought I would knock some dust off my drafting skills after a small chat with @captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works

Seeing this image on the tutorial made me realize, FreeCAD seems to be a Technical Geometry Super-Suite. It makes sense that CAD would grow to include all of these things. But I thought sharing the initial perspective of some one who hasn't looked at this stuff in about 18 years might be interesting.

Granted I'm not actually familiar with most of this stuff, and none of it from the POV of FreeCAD. If this can deliver 10% of what I'm looking at, I'm in for a treat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MangoPenguin@discuss.online 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is an insane bug to have in your CAD software, I don't see how it's usable for any slightly complex part.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Literally every CAD program suffers this to a greater or lesser degree. There are workarounds but they're clunky.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

The issue with FreeCAD is that all the workarounds (so far) are manual. Other apps may well be doing similar things, but they're doing them behind the scenes and the user doesn't have to (for instance) specifically set up a datum plane offset at the exact same distance as the face you want to sketch on and either manage it by hand or use an integrated spreadsheet to set up and reference variables.

I like what I see coming out of FreeCAD these days, but stuff like that is... umm, a lot.