Not The Onion

12355 readers

425 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

287

Japan’s ‘moon sniper’ probe made incredibly accurate landing, but is now upside down (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by roastedDeflator@kbin.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Nevertheless, space officials are describing the mission as a success, despite the fact that the probe, nicknamed the “moon sniper”, appears to have tumbled down a crater slope, leaving its solar batteries facing in the wrong direction and unable to generate electricity.

So it’s like that time the SpaceX booster exploded near its landing craft due to missing it by meters?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Having played KSP, this situation actually seems pretty ok. It didn't explode.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh shit appreciate the expert analysis

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Lol I'll be here all week!

[–] Balex@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know why people insist on trying to diss SpaceX anytime there's space news... Anyway, last time they missed the Autonomous Drone Ship was years ago when they were first trying to land. So I'm not exactly sure what you are referring to.

Plus, with space missions there are usually many different mission objectives, and with this mission the main mission was to "demonstrate its highly precise navigation and landing system" which they determined to be a success. The extra credit mission would be if it landed properly and they were able to do more science with it.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I wasn't insulting SpaceX, and don't see why you think I am. I'm just making a comparison to better understand the situation. What you've described makes the two events all the more similar.

[–] Balex@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fair enough. I've just been jaded from reading people bash on SpaceX anytime anything in space "fails". But yeah, those events are similar in the sense that on the surface it looks like a failure, but they met their main mission goal and learned a lot from it. It sounds like the engine issue might've happened for them before, so hopefully they got a lot of good data from this and are able to fix the issue.

It's important to keep in mind that going to space is very hard. Landing on another celestial body is order of magnitudes harder.