this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
592 points (97.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19331 readers
20 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
592
Sleep() at home (programming.dev)
submitted 8 months ago by JPDev@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean maybe in an early interpreted language like BASIC… even the Intel 8086 could count to 1000 in a fraction of a second

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago

This was in 1985, on a ABC80, a Swedish computer with a 3 MHz CPU. So, in theory it would be much faster, but I assume there were many performance losses (slow basic interpretor and thing like that) so that for loop got close enough to a second for us to use.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_80