Not The Onion

12361 readers

176 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

437

Oklahoma proposal would make watching porn a felony, ban sexting outside marriage (nypost.com)

submitted 10 months ago by roastedDeflator@kbin.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A bill set to be introduced next month would ban consuming or producing sexual content and punish offenders with prison sentences of up to 20 years and $25,000 fines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

MOST porn is art because it has a camera as a medium, and it is viewed as "Entertainment", this bill will have no teeth on arrival.

My main problem is that this kind of logic is next door neighbors with, "That woman was dressed in a pornographic way! She should be dressed from head to toe in black!"

Edit: correction

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Wasn't this exactly what the Larry Flint case was about already? Sounds like political grand standing, so they can say they did something even if that something is completely moot anyway.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 10 months ago

“That woman was dressed in a pornographic way! She should be dressed from head to toe in black!”

There's no production there. Though... if we were to accept that it counts for "production" then technically... if you the "viewer" of that person view it in a sexual way, you'd be able to be held by the law as well.