this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
412 points (96.4% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2268 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Go read it. No seriously. Stop letting Israel tell you what it says, and actually go read it.

Here's the link.

They clearly do not like Zionism and would love to have the entire region back. But they lay out their demands for peace pretty clearly.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also in the linked 2017 charter they state

  1. The following are considered null and void: the Balfour Declaration, the British Mandate Document, the UN Palestine Partition Resolution, and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them. The establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and goes against their will and the will of the Ummah; it is also in violation of human rights that are guaranteed by international conventions, foremost among them is the right to self-determination.

Which certainly sounds like them wanting to destroy Israel.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're saying they don't consider the state of Israel to be legal. That does not mean they intend to keep fighting after their demands for a Palestinian state are met. They are very clear about their peace goals and they do not include the dissolution of Israel.

[–] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Declare our state legitimate, but also

Your state is illegitimate.

Sounds entirely peaceful and would not lead to further future conflicts.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Sounds like something diplomacy deals with on a daily basis.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And then you look at their original 1988 charter,

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

Where they say…

Moreover, if the links have been distant from each other and if obstacles, placed by those who are the lackeys of Zionism in the way of the fighters obstructed the continuation of the struggle, the Islamic Resistance Movement aspires to the realisation of Allah's promise, no matter how long that should take. The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said:

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).

Or,

“ Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory). “

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Well no. Because this charter is meant to supersede that. Just like nobody accuses the US of banning alcohol after having replaced that amendment with one saying alcohol is fine again. Trying to hang the original charter around their neck like an anchor is a propaganda thing meant to prevent them from moderating.

Do we want less violence or more?

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering they have still been launching rockets at civilian centers not to mention killing innocent Israelis, taking hostages, etc since putting in the new charter, Im not sure I believe them.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Since Israel has been killing civilians at the fastest rate since World War 2, I'm not sure I believe their statements.

But if there's to be peace there must be a good faith effort. And Israel has never shown that.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Neither has Hamas. There are no good guys in this conflict, which is what makes it very difficult.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hamas stood for election on a moderate platform. But Israel immediately declared war on them. Hamas reduced their demands for peace to an end of the occupation and an actual Palestinian state. Israel scoffed and bombed hospitals because the doctors were political members of Hamas.

They also attempted to take part in the Trump administration negotiations and got locked out. They then waited for Biden, and got nothing.

How long does one keep writing letters before they pick up a musket?

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And they have been firing rockets the entire god damn time, so I don’t believe they are moderate at all, sorry

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't Hamas have a right to defend themselves?

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also, firing rockets at densely populated civilian centers is “defending yourself” LMAO

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

And bombing hospitals because a Hamas affiliated doctor is? Shooting protest medics?

Hamas is operating at the limits of their capability. Israel is completely capable of small strikes and extractions.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My favorite part is when there have been ceasefires or other attempts at peace, where Hamas says nah and just keeps attacking anyway

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Same thing with Israel. They will have settlers and soldiers attacking while "at peace" or during negotiations.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That's a product of the media accepting IDF propaganda where they decide the day the war "starts". They kill Palestinians and then act like the war started when Hamas retaliates. According to CNN and the IDF they're allowed to do whatever they they want, but one rocket is a breach of the cease fire.

The double standard is exposed and it's not working anymore.