this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
1394 points (97.6% liked)

memes

10375 readers
3399 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I recently switched from Spotify to Deezer. They offer high fidelity audio streaming which is a very noticable difference. Also, they're a bit cheaper, and you can easily move all your songs/saved playlists to Deezer

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You need to be a certain kind of person to perceive audio quality difference. One, you need to be able to detect the difference. Two, you need to be able to appreciate the difference. And Three, which everyone seems to ignore, you need to have bought a sufficiently expensive device that can make the difference.

In short, if you have an $18 desktop speaker, get the FLAC outta here.

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not really. It's noticeable over Bluetooth as well, if your device supports codecs with a high enough bitrate. Obviously Bluetooth is still lossy, but listening experience is way better. The headphones I'm wearing now use aptxHD, with a bitrate of 576kbps. Spotify only offers AAC, with a bitrate of 256kbps.

As far as who can appreciate the difference, I guess? But you don't need to be a concert pianist to appreciate audio. That said, I play many instruments, so maybe I'm biased.

[–] veng@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do a blind test between 256kbps and 576kbps. I dare you.

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not going to argue conjecture. I have over $10,000 in audio equipment and like I already said I play many instruments, so you're not even picking someone good to make generalizations about. Bluetooth codecs are always going to be subpar, but they're probably how most people listen to streaming services most of the time. Anything that is streaming from a PC except Bluetooth is a notable difference.

I just checked the headphones I'm wearing again, they're actually using aptx lossless with a bitrate of 1200kbps. The point is that Deezer offers the same services for less money and higher quality audio streaming.

Apparently, when Spotify does roll out hifi, it will probably be a higher paid tier. Until then, for me, Deezer is the far superior service.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's a good tip; I hadn't heard of that one yet. Is their library as comprehensive as Spotify?

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

I transferred about 10,000 songs and about 30 weren't found

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 10 months ago

It's almost identical.

[–] spiderman@ani.social 1 points 10 months ago

Deezer should spread out their services to more countries.