this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
405 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2165 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 250 billionaires and millionaires on Wednesday reiterated their call on elected representatives of the world’s leading economies to introduce higher taxes on the very richest in society.

In an open letter to political leaders gathered at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the rich signatories said they wished to deliver a clear message: “Tax our extreme wealth.”

“We are surprised that you have failed to answer a simple question that we have been asking for three years: when will you tax extreme wealth?” the letter said.

“Our request is simple: we ask you to tax us, the very richest in society. This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations’ economic growth. But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 91 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This is marketing. If they really wanted this they would lobby for it, the same way they get all their other interests looked after.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

lob·by: seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue.

How isn't this lobbying?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Not the dictionary definition of lobby, but the colloquial sense where it's a synonym for bribery.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Maybe you should use "bribery" then

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Not sure why you’re being downvoted. We literally have a system of legalized bribery in the US. Sure they call it “campaign finance donations,” but it’s no coincidence that politicians come through for those donors every single time. Sadly, this includes foreign governments as well (Russia, Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc.)

The only surprising thing about this is that more foreign governments haven’t caught on. Our politicians are on sale for surprisingly cheap.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

No. Maybe you should mind your business.