Technology

59578 readers

3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

817

Nightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to use (venturebeat.com)

submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

277 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Pardon my ignorance but how do you steal code if it's open source?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 222 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You don’t follow the license that it was distributed under.

Commonly, if you use open source code in your project and that code is under a license that requires your project to be open source if you do that, but then you keep yours closed source.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I still wouldn't call it stealing, but I guess "broke open source code licenses" doesn't have the same impact, but I'd prefer accuracy.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 91 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’s piracy, distributing copyrighted works against the terms of its license. I agree stealing is not really the right word.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah piracy is with like boats.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And parrots and wooden legs.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And buried treasure and rum

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

And eyepatches and scimitars

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Distributing it would be one thing, but profiting off it?

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago

I think it makes the most sense to think of it like stealing the way plagiarism is stealing.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 13 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't call pirating stealing either so

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He took GPLv3 code, which is a copyleft license that requires you share your source code and license your project under the same terms as the code you used. You also can't distribute your project as a binary-only or proprietary software. When pressed, they only released the code for their front end, remaining in violation of GPLv3.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Probably the reason they're moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that's what AGPL tries to prevent

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn't do this.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's true

Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅