this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40313 readers
249 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
21
File server with on-demand sync, preserve the filesystem, and runs without external DB? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rearview@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi, I'm looking for a FOSS file syncing/sharing solution that does all the following specific things:

  • Sync files only when needed, to save space on my client devices.
  • Preserve the filesystem on the server for backups. So no opaque blocks like SeaFile.
  • No need for external MySQL/Postgres container. SQLite would be okay.

Currently the closest thing to fulfill these is oCIS, but it has a decomposedFS file structure which defeats the second point. Nextcloud may run with embedded SQLite, but I'm reluctant to try it again due to previous experiences (lots of bugs, sluggish, etc). Mountain Duck and FileRun are not FOSS. ~~Filestash would be nice if it can integrate with existing Nextcloud/Owncloud clients for the on-demand syncing functionality, especially on Windows.~~ It would be nice to have an open-source alternative to Mountain Duck, in order to use on-demand sync functionalities with a standard storage backend such as SFTP.

Would you have any recommendations of what to do?

Thank you in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Berinkton@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I use Syncthing for this type of task on my PC and Phone and it stores a copy of the shared folder on the server with the option for file versioning. Having a Server is optional by the way.

[–] rearview@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

AFAIK, Syncthing clones the entire folder across peers (the server is just another peer it seems), which isn't ideal for my use case Do you know any current way to configure it for selective syncing?

[–] Jeief73@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I don’t think it can do selective syncing. I’ve been also searching for a similar solution but didn’t find one. Finally opted for syncthing with my most important files. Other files I can get them via web using filestash.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Owncloud supports selective sync, and seems a lot better for performance compared to Nextcloud.

Alternatively you could roll your own with rclone which is essentially an open source alternative to mountain duck. Then you can just use a simple connection via SFTP, FTP, WebDAV, etc...

[–] rearview@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

Non-OCIS Owncloud still needs a dedicated database and recommend against SQLite in prod

I've looked at rclone mounting with the --vfs-cache-* flags. But I'm not sure how it can smart sync like mountain duck or handle conflicts elegantly like the Nextcloud/Owncloud clients do. Let me know how to set it up that way if possible

[–] recursivesive@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I vouch for Syncthing as well. I enabled storing in my own remote hosting provider marking it as untrusted, so my files are encrypted there.