this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
126 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
331 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
126
'No consistent association' between police funding and crime rates in Canada, study indicates (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 10 months ago by sik0fewl@kbin.social to c/canada@lemmy.ca
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There's "no consistent association" between police funding and crime rates across the country, according to a published study by University of Toronto researchers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drusas@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This seems like it would be obvious. Police don't prevent crime; they respond to it.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think the theory is there is some level of "deterrent" at play here. Always seemed like a stretch, and this just looks to reinforce that.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Pretty sure all it really deters is speeding within eyesight of the police car.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There can be a deterrent effect in very specific situations. At crowded public events, like a parade, a police presence can lower crime at that event. Sometimes. But otherwise, police don’t work like that.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I tend to agree completely.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah sorry it sounded like I was correcting you, but I meant to say I agree with you too.