this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
457 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Canada's forestry sector is responsible for far more greenhouse gas emissions than show up in official tallies, potentially leading to policies that aren't in line with the country's climate goals, a new study suggests.

The debate over how much carbon is being absorbed or lost by Canada's forestry sector comes down to the way the federal government does its emissions accounting, said Anthony Taylor, an associate professor of forest management at the University of New Brunswick and one of the study's co-authors.

The "inclusion of that sink is what's causing the biggest difference between what Canada is currently reporting as the emissions from the forestry sector versus what we found in this study," Taylor said.

The study adds to a growing body of research and reports calling into question the way forestry sector emissions are calculated, and the way the industry is managed.

"These methodologies are built on authoritative information that is accepted by subject matter experts and based on mature science," said Cecelia Parsons, a ministry spokesperson.

He was co-author of a recent study published in the scientific journal Nature that estimated global wood harvests will add 3.5 to 4.2 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere annually over the coming decades.


The original article contains 948 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!