this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
76 points (92.2% liked)

Public Health

371 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:


๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] null@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How is the Red Cross responsible for any of that?

[โ€“] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It's hilarious, and telling, that they think the people to lash out against are people needing blood transfusions.

Aka

Cancer, anemia, and trauma patients. Pregnant mothers with complications. Premature infants.

All because "People needing blood must be boomers, so just die."

A trash opinion, from a trash human, proud of its spiteful ignorance, scared of a prick of pain and a minor inconvenience.

[โ€“] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They do have a point though - more people will donate blood if the time it takes to donate and recover is something they can afford to lose. So if people have better wages, good housing that is close to their workplace, etc., then blood donations will also increase.

[โ€“] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The number of upvotes that comment has is also very telling.