this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
76 points (92.2% liked)

Public Health

371 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:

๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
otter@mander.xyz
otter@lemmy.ca
76
Blood donations have fallen to catastrophic levels. Experts say young people need to step up. (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 9 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/publichealth@mander.xyz
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] otter@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

There's a potential for abuse with paying for donations (not saying it should never be done):

  • risk of unsafe blood supplies if people lie about their health history in order to be able to sell their blood
  • ethical concerns around exploiting financially vulnerable people, and turning a life-saving act into another commercial transaction
    • In areas where those vulnerable people aren't protected by the legal system, there's also the potential of OTHER people "harvesting" and selling the blood

Voluntary and altruistic donations are best, and ideally those values are maintained all the way through the donation process. Hopefully technology continues to improve so that we can support those donations with synthesized alternatives

I believe we've had some discussion around this in Canada recently, specifically with donations for plasma. I'm not caught up on it to comment further about it

[โ€“] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In America plasma donation is paid and the harvest locations are typically located in areas with a large population of people who need supplemental income.

[โ€“] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 9 months ago

Paid plasma, even in America, isn't used in transfusions because it is frequently contaminated with various diseases, precisely because you can't trust people with a paid motive to be honest in the health screening.

You can't even trust them to be honest for their own health. People lie to donate at different clinics to avoid the wait period, which is a pretty big problem because the American wait period for plasma selling is already too low to be healthy.

The plasma from paid clinics is used in various manufacturing uses, anything from makeup to products for haemophiliacs, but even after processing and extensive testing there's still a significant risk of infection.

[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 9 months ago

Plasma centers pay about 40 dollars per visit, twice a week. Plasma cannot be donated for 8 weeks after whole blood donation.

Offering up to $40 per donation offers no advantage to entice a plasma donor to switch to whole blood, so should not increase the risk to the blood supply.

Suppose the Red Cross and CSL plasma both used the same payment system for donors. Both would then have access to donor records, and would be able to refuse donations from people who have donated too recently. Donating blood would cost the donor 8 weeks worth of plasma payments: $640.

CSL's payment department would only be involved if donors want to be paid. Unpaid donors could be given a receipt for their $40 tax deductible charitable donation.