Technology

59641 readers

3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

376

NASA, Lockheed Martin Reveal X-59 Quiet Supersonic Aircraft (www.nasa.gov)

submitted 10 months ago by Hypx@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

NASA and Lockheed Martin formally debuted the agency’s X-59 quiet supersonic aircraft Friday. Using this one-of-a-kind experimental airplane, NASA aims to

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Guys, check out the cockpit.

I know technology is wildly advanced and he probably has a 360 view now, but other than test pilots, who are you going to get to fly a plane that lacks a forward view?

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

One of the material issues with supersonic is friction heat buildup. Probably can't have a front windshield at that speed.

Cameras and instrumentation will do just fine tho

[–] Ducky@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The heat is from compression, not friction. And besides that, this thing is only flying at mach 1.5, there are TONS of aircraft that fly at those speeds (and much faster) with windshields.

The reason it doesn't have a front windshield is because the change in shape of the aircraft at the windshield, to be more vertical, was disrupting their method of reducing the sonic boom. The aircraft needs the shape it has, so a windshield would have to be like 20 feet long to offer any forward visibility.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Neat. Thanks for the info!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

With that huge honker of a nose, it’s not like you’d see much anyway. Entire cities could hide behind that

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Looks like there's a forward facing camera.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

but other than test pilots, who are you going to get to fly a plane that lacks a forward view?

This plane will only be flown by test pilots. Its a technology demonstrator. Researchers build one of these to test concepts in physics in the real world.

[–] dasJot@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No instruments, just a microphone to talk to ChatGPT.

[–] rckclmbr@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Basically Stealth IRL.

BTW, fucking coolest, most underrated movie ever IMO

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

With that speed you aren't able to react to anything visible in the flightpath anyway 💨

[–] AstroTechie@lemdro.id 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not supersonic during landing or taxing, which I guess is when a direct view would be more useful.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

I wasn't serious.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

laughs in P-51 mustang

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know planes fly at night yeah, when you can't see things

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Oh of course. Landing might not be fun though.