this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
1229 points (91.9% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9774 readers
426 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

A lot of people wouldn't call a fourteen-year-old a child? Which people? I don't know of any.

Assuming the literal meaning of "literal", a child is, according to the OED, literally:

a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

Can you explain how the pictured human being does not fit the description above?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Can you explain how the pictured human being does not fit the description above?

R Kelly has entered the chat.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Those people might say, back in my days I fought wars even though we know better.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Assuming the literal meaning of “literal”, a child is, according to the OED, literally:

a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

I'm not in any way defending child labor in general or Culvers in particular, but factually speaking, a 14-year-old fits between those two definitions (above the age of puberty but below the legal age of majority).

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

So that's an inclusive "or" in the definition. If EITHER of those criteria are fulfilled, then the definition can be applied. Since the criterion about the age of majority is true then the definition is true.
So conversely, a person above the age of majority who hasn't reached puberty yet (medical condition maybe? Just suspend disbelief for the sake of the argument) is still by definition a child.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social -5 points 10 months ago

Could be a Shawna Rae thing