this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
362 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43962 readers
2051 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mine is OOO for Out Of Office. I always misread it in my head like a ghost and it takes me a few seconds to process. It also doesn't translate to speechβ€”you have to say the whole thing.

Interested to see if others have similar acronyms they beef with.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

GSW isn't an acronym as far as I'm concerned. It's an initialism. But it sure is stupid, I will say. Much faster to say it the "long" way.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I think you mean GSW IAAAFAICIAI

Given how many times people make this same initialism point, it’s time we made an acronym for it.

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's an unfortunate, incorrect phrasing. πŸ˜…

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a very deliberate phrasing, since not everyone agrees that initialisms are not acronyms.

Personally I think that "ackhually that's an initialism not an acronym πŸ€“" is exactly the kind of ultimately irrelevant distinction that internet know-it-alls love to know and point out. I know because I used to be like that too when I was younger.

But often those distinctions are not universally acknowledged or useful in all contexts. Like how strawberries are not scientifically berries, but we still often group them as berries.

Nitpicking word definitions is pointless when the distinction being pointed out is not relevant for the conversation.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not saying I'm the tone of "aaackshually".

I personally love to learn these types of things, so in case someone learns something they'd like to learn, I'm here for it. If people get butthurt or annoyed about it because "I've been using it wrong and that makes it right..." πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I dunno.