this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
371 points (99.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
439 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren't worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 20 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • salt

    table salt, iodized salt, himalayan... they're all the same for me. I don't think my taste buds are adapted to the subtle differences so cheaper ones are better.

  • show-off jewelry, wallet, purses

    showing off jewelry is an invitation to be mugged (again, imo. ymmv) so the cheaper ones are the better options.

  • coffee

    if only you're fine with cheaper ways to wake yourself.

  • wax-based lip balm

    anything beeswax is good. then again ymmv since people can be allergic

  • pure or as-is things like land, electricity, internet, water, oxygen cans, gas/ heating, alcohol (disinfectant)

[–] Chorche@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I mean, I do make coffee myself... But good coffeebeans do come at a premium.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago

I totally agree and it's within reasonable bounds.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Like all things food related, coffee needs to be somewhat fresh, which increases price.

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's not just the freshness but the trees/breed, growing conditions, etc. But I just stick to Adderall.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Salt isn't so much a case of different flavours but of different uses. Like how you'd use rock salt on an icy path, it's better to use maldon salt to garnish a salad and you'd chuck fine sea salt on a soup base. If you think MSG tastes like table salt, though, it's time to hand your tongue in at the front desk. You can also get smoked salt and that kind of carry on.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

you have a good point with "use" as a differentiator.

this is similar to buying non-potable water vs potable, with pretty much the potable water being more expensive.

I think it's within reasonable bounds because the extra cost comes from the added iodine or the minute minerals in maldon to add the extra taste.

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maldon is a sea salt, the extra cost comes from the extraction method rather than adding anything. I don't think it tastes noticeably different, but the large crystals stop it from clumping together and gives you better distribution when sprinkling it over stuff.

something so salty it's called maldon

this dimension isn't real

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

Or cleaning vinegar vs. malt vinegar vs. balsamic vinegar.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There certainly is a difference between regular and himalayan salt, with the latter tasting more, like...uhm...cavey? In a good way. The point of iodized salt is not the taste but the actual iodine, which supports your thyroid gland and other parts of the body.

Internet service may vary greatly in quality; also, for all pure and as-us things it's the source that may matter. I'd pay a little extra for more green options (as in solar electricity, properly treated water, etc. etc.).

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the input on the salt, I'll try it again and see what I am missing on the cavey sensation.

You have a good point with electric sources being a differentiator. This is like with watered bottles saying their water comes from a natural spring in a mountain.

Here's another viewpoint to that, if you will: maybe you are paying a mark up for the source (or the assurance of such source, depending on the marketing) and the pure commodity itself doesn't have to be marked up for it.

As for internet, I think quality happens because businesses tier it to be. And, of course, with pure internet you have to pay for what amount you have used. I still don't think you need to go full bells and whistles as it is more reasonable to just pay what you used. I understand though that some areas don't have much choice on this.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love my speckled ax coffee beans, but if you didn't go down the rabbit hole of a good grinder and coffee machine then expensive coffee is not worth it.

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

NGL, I've never had an issue with cheap/expensive coffee at all, as long as it's real coffee rather than instant. I use a pour-over or aeropress rather than machine (or make cold brew), but I've never even had a cheap bag of preground coffee that was bad enough call it worse than an expensive one, rather than a different.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but everyone's pallet is different and some can taste the difference between a fresh roast and a sale one. Personally, I can taste the difference in coffee when I have a bag that's opened for over a few weeks, but not sure if it matters how recent the roasting was done.

I spend $$ on coffee more to support a roasting business that is small and makes a fresh batch to order. It's also nice that the bean sourcing is better for the workers, so I hope.

I find the aeropress makes a really great cup considering how quick it is to brew.

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Personally, I can taste the difference in coffee when I have a bag that's opened for over a few weeks, but not sure if it matters how recent the roasting was done.

Sorry, yeah, this is more what I meant - as long as the coffee is relatively fresh (my house goes through about a bag a week, so it never gets time to sit and go stale) the price doesn't seem to get you a better/worse cup of coffee.
Of course, my aunt got me an expensive bag of coffee for christmas that apparently makes really good cold brew, so it's sat in the freezer for now waiting for better weather, so I might change my mind in a couple of months. Gonna stick with Lidl own brand beans for now though.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Nice, I use Lidl beans before, let me check if they have a light roast.

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

About salt, afaik there is no difference in taste, only in texture (by grain size) and color.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

And density. There's more salt in a spoonful of table salt than a spoonful of kosher salt

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

🀣 This is an awful list. Pretty much everything on it is worth the better version. Except jewelry and electricity I guess.

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Pretty spot on in my opinion.

I buy the cheapest coffee beans I can from supermarket, and have had coffee snobs comment how much they love the coffee I make and where I buy it from.

Salt is salt, it tastes the same.

Not sure on the land one.. That one is a bit odd admittedly.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

this is where your-mileage-may-vary(ymmv) comes in.

I am sure everybody has different preferences to things and the point still comes across. You might still splurge on to some preferences but "better version" doesn't mean the "expensive" bells-and-whistles one.

I am happy reading each comment and knowing how people treat their salt, coffee and internet with different kinds of values.

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Everybody is stuck on defending salt while I’m like….land? Like real estate? Because there are definitely reasons to buy nicer properties than cheaper ones. I’m confused.

[–] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

I get a kilo of whole bean coffee from Costco for like $15 and it lasts me 2-3 months. I bought a pricey French press 3 years ago after using a keurig for years, and the press has paid for itself many times over with not having to buy k-cups. The improvement in taste is also night and day. I won’t even touch keurig coffee anymore.

I haven’t really done the math to price out each 20 oz cup of coffee I drink, but it can’t be more than like $0.25 per cup. If there’s a way to throw a quarter at something and wake me up more effectively than that, I’d love to hear about it.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

table salt, iodized salt, himalayan... they're all the same for me. I don't think my taste buds are adapted to the subtle differences so cheaper ones are better.

Do yourself a favor and find some blue salt. It's absolutely better/different in flavor vs those other ones!

But as far as salt goes, you have to know when and how to use it. Finishing salts are generally added on top of food, and not mixed into recipes. You also don't want to use table salt as a finishing salt.

But try the blue salt. Seriously.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the suggestion! I'll try it when I stumble on some.