this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
24 points (90.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40394 readers
313 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
24
Best external SSD for high-uptime use? (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was wondering if anyone could point me in the direction of an external SSD that'd last me a while being plugged into my incredibly simple SBC home server. I've done a bit of research but haven't found much information about USB-connected SSDs and their longevity in terms of 24/7 use.

Some More Specifics What I'm aiming to do is use this drive as NAS that I can access on my home network, it'd mostly be used for syncing backups from devices, but would also probably get use as a general-purpose file storage solution. Basically, it's going to be plugged into my little Raspberry Pi all the time, but will only be used sporadically and generally won't be writing huge amounts of data at a time.

Given the above information, are there any external SSDs you could recommend for this application? Or am I worrying too much and should just buy your average Samsung/Kingston/WD/Seagate etc.?

Edit:

Thanks for the advice everyone, that was quick and helpful! The solution I'm gonna go with is a USB caddy/housing to hold a standard internal HDD, so hopefully this is helpful for anyone else in a similar place with a simple home server like mine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any specific reason why?

[–] cesium@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For one, they are generally cheaper than your usual external drive. They usually last longer, too.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see, thanks. I'm still stuck in the mentality "the more parts there are, the easier for it to break" :P. Or that it'd affect the speed in some way

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but in this case the external drives have the same USB to SATA/M.2 adapter internally. So the amount of parts is the same, but they can be replaced individually.

Also, the seperate adapter can help reusing any other old internal drives. For example as an offsite backup.

[–] Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Enclosure and NVMe are cheaper than internal and probably of better quality.