soundconjurer

joined 11 months ago
[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

@possiblylinux127 @tabular , well, regarding a married couple I know, the wife was away taking care of her granddaughter for a bit, came back to her husband having sketchy people in their home while she was gone. The wife wanted the police to sweep the house for drugs and alleged these people probably brought drugs in their home. The police said there was nothing they can do. Lovely double standards.
Edit: Also, you could smell the pot off the people easily. They were definitely stoned.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

@possiblylinux127 @DaPorkchop_. ZFS has a persistent L2ARC cache now.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 2 months ago

@possiblylinux127 @chris Hence their statement "I’d consider btrfs if ...".

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 3 months ago

@EuroNutellaMan @teawrecks 2/ I think in Windows Server 2019, they went back to allowing for pure commandline OSes. I am sure that has always been the case before it, or maybe the desktop could be disabled in previous installations. But, why waste resources of a desktop environment for server operations.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@EuroNutellaMan @teawrecks 100% agree , terminal is the king of computing. GUIs are convenient, sure. However, when I am writing software to do computation, I am definitely not wanting to run it in an environment with a GUI. I want every speck of resources free for my program. It's easier to write scripts as well expressing the algorithm in my head than it is for me to coordinate settings on a GUI or keyboard inputs.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@traches , I firmly believe that. It wouldn't be what it is if it didn't do it well. In my opinion, Arch has the best documentation and I use it for other distros. I don't use Arch and wouldn't recommend it to someone new to the scene.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

@pupbiru @traches I have used Arch, I am definitely not new to the Linux scene. I have servers, all my workstations and laptops run it. I professionally write software. I didn't like the Arch experience at all. I qould definitely never recommend it to anyone, that's something they can one day decide for themselves.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

@pupbiru @traches , I certainly second this. People don't need to become experts in Linux Distros, but they need to know what they want and need from their OS.

If it's browsing and writing word documents, maybe you don't need a constant stream up updates and a stable LTS would suffice. Maybe even a regular 6 month release like Fedora will probably suffice. Even Debian would be great, if upgrading is annoying and newest software isn't really important.

Gaming? There are distros for that.

[–] soundconjurer@mstdn.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

@okamiueru @glaber , well it is an issue to fuck up by design. There are third party plugins for ODF for MSO that work better than its own implementation.

I am forced to use MSO for work, but it's LO for everything else of mine.

Edit: One should also see what they can do to make Microsoft improve/fix their ODF implementation since it is an ISO standard. There has to be something to get that ball rolling.