PAPPP

joined 1 year ago
[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 3 months ago

I initially didn't do enough of that in my PhD thesis (CS, about some weird non-frame-based imaging tech that is still only of academic interest), and my committee demanded I add more stake-claiming favorable comparisons to other tech to my introduction before I submitted.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 months ago

Alternate perspective: I use the heck out of session restore, and it has driven me nuts that it hasn't worked properly under Wayland.

I tend to use different virtual desktops for different projects, so being able to reboot (because of a kernel update and needing to load a module or something) without losing and having to rebuild that state is is super valuable.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago

...I probably should have checked the byline before posting. It does still come from the same material, just a little more directly.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's some weirdness on that because she did some important but not-very-public work at IBM in the 60s with their ACS/"Project Y" effort that did what we later call superscalar/multi-issue processors like ...20 years before those terms existed. As part of that she wrote a paper about "Dynamic Instruction Scheduling" in 1966 under her pre-transition identity that is a like retroactive first cause for a bunch of computer architecture ideas.

There was almost nothing about that work in public until Mark Smotherman was doing some history of computing work in the late 90s, put out a call for information about it, and she produced a huge trove of insider information after deciding it was worth exposing the provenance. There's a neat long-form LATimes piece about the situation which is probably the primary source for the history in OP's link.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

That's credible.

I find the hardware architecture and licensing situation with AMD much more appealing than Nivida and really want to like their cards for compute, but they sure make it challenging to recommend.

I had to do a little dead reckoning with the list of supported targets to find one that did the right thing with the 12CU RDNA2 680M.

I've been meaning to put my findings on the internet since it might be useful to someone else, this is a good a place as any.

On a fresh Xubuntu 22.04.4 LTS install doing the official ROCm 6.1 setup instructions, using a Minisforum UM690S Ryzen 9 6900HX/64GB/1TB box as the target, and after setting the GPU Memory to 8GB in the EFI before boot so it doesn't OOM.

For OpenMP projects, you'll probably need to install libstdc++-12-dev in addition to the documented stuff because HIP won't see the cmath libs otherwise (bug), then the <CMakeConfig.txt> mods for adapting a project with accelerator directives to that target are

find_package(hip REQUIRED)
list(APPEND CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH /opt/rocm-6.1.0)
set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER ${HIP_HIPCC_EXECUTABLE})
set(CMAKE_CXX_LINKER   ${HIP_HIPCC_EXECUTABLE})
target_compile_options(yourtargetname PUBLIC "-lm;-fopenmp;-fopenmp-targets=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa;-Xopenmp-target=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa;-march=gfx1035"

And torch, because I was curious how that would go (after I watched the Docker based suggested method download 30GB of trash then fall over, and did the bare metal install instead) seems to work with PYTORCH_TEST_WITH_ROCM=1 HSA_OVERRIDE_GFX_VERSION=10.3.0 python3 testtorch.py which is the most confidence inspiring.

Also amdgpu_top is your friend for figuring out if you actually have something on the GPU compute pipes or if it's just lying and running on the CPU.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Neat.

I set up some basic compute stuff with the ROCm stack on a 6900HX-based mini computer the other week (mostly to see if it was possible as there are some image processing workloads a colleague was hoping to accelerate on a similar host) and noticed that the docs occasionally pretend you could use GTT dynamicly allocated memory for compute tasks, but there was no evidence of it ever having worked for anyone.

That machine had flexible firmware and 64GB of RAM stuffed in it so I just shuffled the boot time allocation in the EFI to give 8GB to the GPU to make it work, but it's not elegant.

It's also pretty clumsy to actually make things run, lot of "set the magic environment variable because the tool chain will mis-detect the architecture of your unsupported card" and "Inject this wall of text into your CMake list to override libraries with our cooked versions" to make things work. Then it performs like an old GTX1060, which is on one hand impressive for an integrated part in a fairly low wattage machine, and on the other hand is competing with a low-mid range card from 2016.

Pretty on brand really, they've been fucking up their compute stack since before any other vendor was doing the GPGPU thing (abandoning CTM for Stream in like a year).

I think the OpenMP situation was the least jank of the ways I tried getting something to offload on an APU, but it was also one of the later attempts so maybe I was just getting used to it's shit.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't trust that they're 100% compatible with mainline Linux, ChromeOS carries some weird patches and proprietary stuff up-stack.

I have a little Dell Chromebook 11 3189 that I did the Mr.Chromebox Coreboot + Linux thing on, a couple years ago I couldn't get the (weird i2c) input devices to work right, that has since been fixed in upstream coreboot tables and/or Linux but (as of a couple months ago) still don't play nice with smaller alternative OSes like NetBSD or a Haiku nightly.

The Audio situation is technically functional but still a little rough, the way the codec in bay/cherry trail devices is half chipset half external occasionally leads to the audio configuration crapping itself in ways that take some patience and/or expertise to deal with (Why do I suddenly have 20 inoperable sound cards in my pulse audio settings?).

This particular machine also does some goofy bullshit with 2 IMUs in the halves instead of a fold-back sensor, so the rotation/folding stuff via iio sensors is a little quirky.

But, they absolutely are fun, cheap hacker toys that are generally easy targets.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can still readily get crank hand drills, I have a (vaguely) modern one that I use for situations where I want the control/tactile feedback and/or have restricted access or the like. It covers a different set of problems than the standard cordless.

Mine is Fiskars branded and a little plasticky (and not the version they sell currently). I like it enough that I'll get a nicer one if I kill it.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I will preface that Xorg is obviously an unmaintainable mess of legacy decisions and legacy code, and I have both a machine that runs Hyprland and a machine that usually starts Plasma in Wayland mode so the Wayland situation getting to be more-or-less adequate with persistent irritations here and there... but Wayland is trauma-driven-development. It's former xorg developers minimizing their level of responsibility for actual platform code, but controlling the protocol spec, and in the position to give up on X in time with their preferred successor.

Essentially all of the platform is being outsourced to other libraries and toolkits, who are all doing their own incompatible things (Which is why we have like 8 xdg-desktop-portal back-ends with different sets of deficiencies, because portals were probably designed at the wrong level of abstraction), and all have to figure out how to work around the limitations in the protocols. Or they can spend years bikeshedding about extensions over theoretical security concerns in features that every other remotely modern platform supports.

Some of that outsourcing has been extremely successful, like Pipewire.

Some attempts have been less successful, like the ongoing lack of a reasonable way to handle input plumbing in a Wayland environment (think auto-type and network kvm functionality) because they seem to have imagined their libinput prototype spun out of Weston would serve as complete generic input plumbing, and it's barely adequate for common hardware devices - hopefully it's not too late to get something adequate widely standardized upon, but I'm increasingly afraid we missed the window of opportunity.

Some things that had to be standardized to actually work - like session management - have been intentionally abdicated, and now KDE and Gnome have each become married to their own mutually-incompatible half solution, so we're probably boned on that ever working properly until the next "start over to escape our old bad decisions" cycle.... which, if history holds, isn't that far away.

We're 15 years in to Wayland, and only in the last few years has it made it from "barely a tech demo" through "Linux in the early 2000s" broken, and in the last year to "problems with specific features" broken ... and it is only 4 years younger than the xf86->xorg fork.

[–] PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

The near instant heat up is a big part of how I ended up with my Bambino with its "Thermojet"(Thermoblock coil thing) heater.

3s from wake to ready, it takes longer to grind and prep than to heat. I usually pull a blank shot through the clean portafilter into the cup I'm going to pull the shot in so the downstream parts aren't crashing the temperature, but that's still seconds.

Ascaso and Decent have more up-market offerings with thermoblock heaters that are similarly fast but offer more control. I wasn't 5-10x price compelled for my needs, and I'm certainly not over 100x price in to that thing... But it is a great feature that the commercial derived machines don't do.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org to c/coffee@lemmy.world
 

As I continue my palate-developing tour of Lexington, KY's local roasters, three selections from GarageBean'd. I've tasted them as 16:32 ~30s espresso and as 11:200 Hoffman-method Aeropress, fresh ground appropriately for each.

They're super reasonably priced ($10-15/lb) for single-origin small-roaster products, and do bags from 8oz-1lb (and samplers) so you can try stuff, both of which are things I appreciate.

All three I picked are extremely characterful, and at least pretty good. I intentionally picked stuff that would be interesting for palate development rather than specifically to my tastes. I've done the reading for other-than-washed process coffees, but not tried many, and that was a lot of the focus for this round.

EspressYoSelf is a fairly classic modern espresso blend, the bill lists components from Brazil, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, & India. It also notes a mix of Washed, Dry, Natural and Monsooned components. They roast it barely into medium-dark, just over 5/10 on their scale, which is around my preference for Espresso. It's SUPER complex with lots of molasses and spice notes. It does have a slightly "dirty" finish compared to some other espresso blends from my local tour; I'm not a good enough taster to pick out for sure why, I think it might be the monsooned probably-Indian-robusta component. The body kind of reminds me of stabilized whipped cream: it starts out feeling really substantial and kind of thins in your mouth, which is nifty. Good. Not enough to displace Nates from my #1 spot for local espresso blends, but definitely worth having.

#sarahstrong "Light" (they sell it at two roast levels) is a Natural process from Sidama, Ethopia, roasted light, 1.5/10 on their scale. It's super interesting, but a little funkier than I'm generally in to. Not bad, the body and fruityness are excellent... but there's a lot of that "rotten fruit" kind of fermented flavor that naturals are known to pick up, and it's a little much for me as an everyday coffee. Definitely a fun pick if you want to try a face full of natural process character.

Rise & Shine! is a Black-Honey process from Marcala, Honduras roasted to Medium (4.5/10). It would be high-character coffee in any other company, but it comes off as the most normal here. It's naturally quite sweet up front, with a very prominent dark honey/brown sugar kind of flavor, a bitter note in the middle, and a very clean, classic "nice cup of coffee" finish. It's the house coffee at a local bakery and really suits the role - it always feels like something I should be drinking out of china with a fancy pastry.