ElmiHalt

joined 1 year ago
[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Well see, now you're actually making good points that do have some value to them.

First and foremost, that a concept built by a bunch of students, it doesn't have to be perfect, it's goal is to prove the concept. The first ever built plain that actually worked wasn't perfect - does that mean people who built it should've abandoned it?

Not everything has to be equally viable in all circumstance. Building made in regions with high seismic activity are built in a way to account for that activity. If one lives on a flatland with zero seismic activity - those extra resources spent on a building might seem worthless to such a person, but they are not and if said person says that "they can just build normal houses there, what's the issue? " then the person is ignorant (and also a complete prick).

As to the car failing as an SUV - I haven't seen where they driven during the test run so I can't say whether or not it failed. They got from the point A to the point B so if I had to guess I say it worked fine.

P. S. I'm not sure why I'm wasting my time on this with that attitude of yours with prove me wrong and such... Yeah, whatever

[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, no, the downvotes have nothing to do with where you live yet they have something to do with you being arrogant and ignorant

[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's plastic not wax

[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So a cube? 0.0 and 1.1 are on a top side and 0.1 and 1.0 are on a bottom side so every line is a diagonal of a cube's face

[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And to add on the "the second the market opens" part - landlords can buy houses even before they are fully built and liveable which is not really an option for a person with no house because such an investment leaves you with no place to live and no money (mostly).

[–] ElmiHalt@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm not saying all landlords do so but what you described happens quite often. Landlords buy a property when they already have a place to live in and then rent out said property to someone who has none. And now said someone can't own a property because there's none on the market as all are bought out so all what is left to do for those people is to rent. It's an oversimplification of course and there's a lot of nuance to it but the general message still stands - if a person with a house buys another house to rent it out then one less house remains to be bought for people with no house.