this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
219 points (95.4% liked)

memes

10393 readers
1853 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Take solace that no matter how bad your relationships have ended. You didn't have to sort out beanie babies in front of a judge, bailiff, YOUR LAWYER and hers, and like a dozen people in an audience, on the clamels that one day ONE of these might be valuable.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 year ago

Nowadays they would be dividing random numbers allegedly tied to a badly drawn monkey.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Too bad we as a species didn't learn our lesson, but people today fall for blockchain scams.

[–] Nintendo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ty beanies are infinitely less of a scam than crypto too. even if your beanie baby was worth nothing, at least you still had a physical stuffed animal that you can wipe your tears with. wtf are people doing with their Google drive hosted jpeg?

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's NFT. Not quite the same thing. Built on crypto tech, sure, but just a subset of the tech and how it ended up used was very much a scam.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You also don't own the picture. You own the space on the blockchain that points to that picture, maybe.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

There's always some "collector" items than people have to have. Just look at some of the Funko Pop collections people have on Reddit.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I'm waiting for one with Funko Pops... but a lot deal in the 3 digits already and some 4 digits too. Try to find the whole collection of Futurama or Firefly in mint boxes!

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/couple-divorce-beanie-babies/

Snopes says yeah it's legit no caveats.

"This isn't about toys. It's about control," Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle told the couple. "Because you folks can't solve it, it takes the services of a District Court judge, a bailiff and a court reporter." There was snickering among the five or six people in the gallery.

Jesus even atthe time the judge thought it was rediculous.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine being the judge.

Spend 4 years and a few hundred grand getting law degree.

Spend 10 years practicing law, late nights, burning midnight oil.

Spend more years and money garnering support to be appointed/elected as judge.

Be appointed as judge.

Preside over 2 petulant children who can't even divide stuffed toys amicably.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They couldn't bring in a folding table for them?

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

No the judge was exasperated from the proceedings that two adults couldn't settle splitting fucking toys. Wanted to make an example for future cases when splitting property.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Doubt it would be able carry this sick collection