this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
120 points (95.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
648 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two of my coworkers frequently mention shows like "Encounters" or "Ancient apocalypse" or whatever. I'm not the best at debating or forming arguments against these though I do feel strongly that bold claims require better evidence than a blurry photo and an eyewitness account. How do you all go about this?

Today I clumsily stumbled through conversation and said "I'll need some evidence" and was hit with "there's plenty of evidence in the episode 'Lights over Fukushima'". I didn't have an answer because I haven't watched it. I'm 99% sure that if I watch it it's gonna be dramatized, designed to scare/freak you out a little and consist of eyewitness accounts and blurry photos set to eerie music. But I'm afraid I just sound like a haughty know-it-all if I do assert this before watching.

These are good people and I want to remain on good terms and not come across as a cynical asshole.

(Sorry if language is too formal or stilted. Not my native tongue)

(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Off topic, but

(Sorry if language is too formal or stilted. Not my native tongue)

is unnecessary. You sound great! Completely natural. I would have assumed you were a native English speaker.

Anyway, as others have said, don’t waste your time arguing. Just have fun with it. They may be entertaining to listen to, and might turn into good friends. You’ll go crazy trying to debate them, though.

[–] SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you :)

I'm just so used to my English falling apart completely when forced to speak it in real time, instead of writing it. I feel like I am not great at making it sound casual either when writing.


Yeah, the common thread here seems to be not to argue and that's likely good advice.

[–] CyanFen@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a skeptic at heart, but it's fun and ultimately harmless to pretend or even vehemently believe that aliens exist and have visited earth. In my opinion there's no reason to shut them down or try to prove them wrong. Of course unless they're taking it to a degree in which it's likely to harm others.

[–] Remmock@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

If nobody challenges them on the harmless stupidity it will fester into greater ignorance they feel entitled to perpetuate.

[–] username_unavailable@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Wow. Three hours πŸ˜…. Not before bed lmao

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/j9w-i5oZqaQ?si=uDet-RnDCFZMuJtl

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Jason Colavito does the hard work so you don't have to. There's such a firehose of claims that it is almost possible to keep up with it all unless you are a fan. Colavito does a good job of keeping on the various series and pointing out the problems.

If you wanted to engage with people who are promoting this kind of thing you could try and engage on a more meta level rather than slog through each claim. They often rely on the argument from disbelief: I can't believe the ancients were capable of this, therefore it was aliens. Or you could point out that not believing ancient people were capable of building some monument and had to rely on aliens of Atlanteans is a bit racist. However, be warned, you'll soon be considered the Fun Police and you are better off letting it slide unless someone won't stop banging on about it.

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You might be taking some friendly debate as more sinister than it is. It's okay to tell them you straight up don't believe and need some better evidence than a show on Netflix. When they tell you to watch it, ask them to sum it up for you, and go from there.

You can laugh at the absurdity without being mean-spirited. Most people who get hooked into that stuff don't really believe, they like the "but what if?" Aspect of it.

Set phasers to full power!

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The thing is that other than the odd true believer, most people who watch these things are not interested in engaging in an intellectual debate about them. It's essentially a diversion and light entertainment.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

Why do you feel the need to "deal with it"?

You can express your opinion without pushing it on others or trying to convince them. Is this a mystery to the social media generation?

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί