this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
633 points (89.3% liked)

General Discussion

12084 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Legalize all drugs. Keep prices low(street value) with quality monitoring paid for by tax of product. Any further tax revenue from product to be used for addiction treatment.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Writing "Abolish PACs and lobbying" implies reverting Citizens United v FEC so you probably don't need a separate list item for it

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lobbying and pacs weren't created by citizens united.

Honestly, reversing citizens united is the only part that's needed. Pacs and lobbying aren't intrinsically bad, they just need regulation and oversight that they don't have because of citizens united.

A group of people showing able to pool their resources to advocate for legislation, and people should be able to ask their representatives to take action on their behalf.
Pacs and lobbying are now far more than those two things, so we need regulation, but we still need them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Needs more limitations on investment in the stock market, more investment into co-ops and employee owned businesses, and more investment into rail infrastructure and other good civic infrastructure at the federal level. Also, change from general ranked choice voting, to the schulze method.

Also I wanna see a real move towards taco tuesday. We think it's a meme or whatever, but like an experimental free food day, or free single meal, for at least one day a week, seems totally achievable, and like it would do some good. Maybe try to integrate some community gardening into it or something, set up some federal system for that, that would be fucking sick dude hoo lee.

Edit: If you're getting rid of states, or like, trying to rethink them, I think I remember seeing some maps redrawn with states if they all had totally equal population, which you could do, and I've also seen some maps that allocate states based more on natural resources, than just having like, a lot of the western states be shitty squares and stuff. I think I saw one based on water tables, but I can't seem to find it or remember the name of it. You'd probably wanna go in for stuff like that, if you wanted to still retain the idea of states, and give them a reason to exist but also be fair and not lame.

load more comments (1 replies)

UBI requires such a large reorganization of the economy that you may as well add democratization of the workplace, and it would get done earlier. I think both would be great personally.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Can someone explain to me what "collateral for loan is realized gain" means?

[–] dfc09@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Basically (and I'm not an expert here), the Uber rich get tax free spending money without taking big taxable salaries by leveraging their assets for super low interest loans. Current tax codes don't consider these loans as taxable income, but they're being used for the same things us peasants use our income for. By considering these cash flows as taxable, billionaires wouldn't be able to hide behind the "it's net worth not liquid income" bullshit these use to dodge taxes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tmishka@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Limit the age for candidates, to the pension maximum

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Three the most important things are missing:

  • abolish home education;
  • mandatory elementary education;
  • get rid of multiple-choice tests.

Most of the changes won't matter if people are uneducated or easily misled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Legalizing Prostitution just creates more Human Trafficking, as a result of allowing human traffickers to operate in the open under the guise of legality. We have decades of evidence that lead to this conclusion. We don't need to keep trying it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί