this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
148 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2302 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Judges say decision should be made by parliament but stress that such unions should not face discrimination

India’s top court has declined to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriages, saying it is beyond its scope and should be decided by parliament, but emphasising that queer relationships should not face discrimination by the state.

The marriage ruling will be a disappointment for LGBTQ+ people in India, who had hoped the supreme court judges would recognise their constitutional right to marriage equality.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stormtrooper@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 year ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


India’s top court has declined to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriages, saying it is beyond its scope and should be decided by parliament, but ruled that gay couples would be allowed to adopt children.

It was only in 2018 that the supreme court scrapped a colonial-era law banning homosexuality in India.

However, society has remained largely conservative and there was resistance to opening up marriage to same-sex couples.

The Indian government had opposed the case, calling the arguments for equality “urban elitist views” and stating that marriages were not “comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, a wife and children”.

A five-judge bench of the supreme court headed by the chief justice of India heard arguments in the case between April and May and reserved its order on 12 May.

Members of India’s LGBTQ+ community say they face discrimination despite the 2018 judgment, and that the absence of legal backing for same-sex marriages violates their constitutional rights.


The original article contains 203 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 21%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

Y'all want to have a gay-in at parliament I can be pretty gay. I mean, I'm not Indian but I can be for pay.