this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
634 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all! I'm wondering if someone can help me pick between these two apps. They seem to be the most commonly recommended Android front-ends for OpenStreetMaps, but I'm wondering what the pros/cons/differences are. Thanks in advance!

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] onion@feddit.de 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

(I haven't used osmand in a minute)

Osmand has a buttload of features but the UI is kinda complicated, whereas OrganicMaps has a simple UI but less features.

If you want car navigation I'd recommend MagicEarth because it has traffic info

[โ€“] max641@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[โ€“] odious@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For some people, not getting stuck in traffic is worth using proprietary software.

Are there any FOSS navigation apps with (paid?) traffic info?

[โ€“] max641@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

For traffic info, I would use Google maps. For other map related data, OSMand / Organic Maps.

[โ€“] Carighan@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Proprietary is not some evil demon. Sure open source is better, but it's just one bullet point in a pro/con table.

[โ€“] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 8 months ago

It kind is, though. Proprietary doesn't mean paid; I'll pay for OSS apps. Proprietary means they won't release the source code, and this is bad for a whole bunch of reasons. But the reason that gets my goat is that it's almost guaranteed that proprietary app was developed with open source tools, and probably uses at least some open source code. I fucking hate hypocrites.

[โ€“] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Deal breaker for people who care about Free software

[โ€“] Carighan@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

who care too much about Free software

There's a difference between caring and caring too much. I care about eating healthy. Doesn't mean I never eat anything unhealthy and immediately throw people who try to eat a sweet out of my third-floor window.

Not about throwing someone's off but doing it myself

[โ€“] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, that's a nice and concise summary!

Where does MagicEarth get its traffic data from? Also is it FOSS? I couldn't find much about it.

[โ€“] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 3 points 8 months ago

Some of it is user reported. I think they have a 3rd party provider as well but Iโ€™m not 100% certain on that.

[โ€“] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 22 points 8 months ago

Big pro for Organic Maps is rendering speed. So smooth and perfect...
Everything else is on the OsmAnd side. It's loaded with features, everything you may want and more. But rendering lag is so annoying that I'm using Organic by default.

[โ€“] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago

I thinl they are intended for very different kind of users and use cases: Organic Maps is a simple and traightforward navigtaion app. It does not do much, but does it very well. OsmAnd is a feature-rich app for power users who want to tinker and customize.

I have both on my phone :)

[โ€“] zecg@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

OSMand is a much more powerful tool even with no plugins and it's a mature app you can count on.

[โ€“] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand Organic Maps has less features, which means a much simpler interface and much better performance

[โ€“] zecg@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Performance of OSMand is actually great on mid-level SOCs I usually get. Anything with snapdragon 6xx or more and performance is a non-issue for me, especially since it has a new opengl2 renderer. Also, it uses very, very little battery navigating me with voice (so screen off) along a pre-defined GPX on locally downloaded maps in airplane mode. And the simplicity of the interface is a downside once you spend a few hours tinkering with OSMand and get used to all it can do.

[โ€“] pietervdvn@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago
[โ€“] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Iโ€™ll go ahead and throw another option out there. Magic Earth. I would use OsmAnd or Organic Maps more often but neither support routing with public transport other than the train.

[โ€“] pietervdvn@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

Also a great option, but closed source

[โ€“] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

I don't know anything about Organic Maps, but Osm& has been great to me. The only issue I have is that address lookup is pretty abysmal, but there may be a fix for that I'm not aware of.

[โ€“] tinwhiskers@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Oruxmaps is pretty good too.