this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fafner@yiffit.net 15 points 1 year ago

Tl;Dr They are trying to make a better atomic clock that could provide a more precise definition of a second then we currently have.

[–] Andreas@feddit.dk 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this like when they made the kilogram some function of the speed of light instead of the weight of a metal ball in a French museum?

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not exactly. The kilogram was redefined in a fundamentally different way, moving from an artifact, which will change with time, to a fundamental property of nature, that as far as anyone knows, will be the same at all times. The second was already defined in such a way. Any such definition still requires some sort of measurement though to get something usable. Different ways of measuring the same type of definition can be more precise, and in this redefinition they think they've found a more precise method that works in the same fundamental manner. Both measure the oscillation rate of atoms, but the proposed element is thought to give better precision.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

The most relevant paragraph:

Now, using a new way of linking the clocks with ultra-fast lasers, researchers have shown that different kinds of optical atomic clocks can be placed a few kilometres apart and still agree within 1 part in 10¹⁸. This is just as good as previous measurements with pairs of identical clocks a few hundred metres apart, but about a hundred times more precise than achieved before with different clocks or large distances.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't wait for decimal time with 100,000 seconds/day /s

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'll likely happen once we move to living mostly in space (if we survive that long ofc)

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

With a full switch to metric, hopefully. We’ve lost a Mars probe to unit confusion already.

[–] TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually quite like this idea. Or we could start using number base 12 instead of 10 everywhere else.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This would outdate centuries of equipment and scientific publications in the metric system.

A better idea is the International Fixed Calendar:

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Wont that fuck up the other measures that use the second as a basis?

[–] radix@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would this affect our lives on Earth?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Most likely indirectly, like how GPS has to account for satellites not matching the passage of time on earth due to relatively.