Also clean energy but personally virtual reality 100%. Give me that SAO experience, damn it. Just without y'know the bad stuff
Edit: mandatory Link
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
120 points (96.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43962 readers
1254 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Hoverboards obviously.
Catgirls
and space adapted humans
- radiation resistance (I think charnobyl wolves have that already)
- better eyeballs, digestive system and bones
- propulsion system
- vacum survivability
Not so much technology, but I'd fund the Howard Society for real. For those unfamiliar, it's a program to identify people who are genetically predisposed to natural long life and pay them to have kids with each other; it's a core plot point in a bunch of Heinlein novels.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Arcologies or greenhouse super domes for food production of any kind wherever it's desired
Or carbon nanotube mass production so we can build mile-high connected super structures
It's not really science fiction since there are scientists working on it right now, because capitalism is the brake of development. I would invest on photonic computer research, that would help advancement of society in all aspect.
load more comments
(2 replies)