this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
416 points (93.7% liked)

World News

38831 readers
2321 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not entirely sure on that, because whatever intel he's getting fed on there war, has to be the best horseshit ever. I don't think that even Putin can ignore ~15.000 lost vehicles.

Meaning, he could very well believe he'd win.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Whomever wipes Putin off the planet gets a blowjob.

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

When you have a madman threatening nuclear confrontation, when does the probability of a first strike that might prevent significant retaliation have fewer megadeaths than being the victim of a first strike? This is the problem with sustained nuclear sabre rattling. What if its taken seriously?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›