this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
282 points (83.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2618 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 147 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (12 children)

As a lifelong democrat, I find this to be very dangerous rhetoric. It sounds tonedeaf. Regardless of the candidate, being critical of politicians is a cornerstone of democracy.

I understand it's important to be a united front, but the need to seemingly bring dissenting voices into line is not a good way to do it. We cannot force people to say we have a perfect candidate for the sake of avoiding discussion.

Edit: a word

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 26 points 9 months ago

We cannot force people to say we have a perfect candidate for the sake of avoiding discussion.

They seem to believe if something isn't discussed, the other side won't notice and / or discuss it either. That's delusional.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 10 points 9 months ago

I don't think we have enough nuance in our politics to have that as more than an idyllic dream.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I disagree that's what's happening here. He's saying that you can be disappointed with Biden all you want, but not voting for him means we get trump and Project 2025 and fascism.

I don't know a single person that is stoked on Biden, but he's all we have right now. And we cannot let Trump get a second term.

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately, that’s not what Fetterman is saying.

Fetterman noted during an interview an uptick in Democrats who have become more critical of Biden lately, and said it’s only helping former President Trump.

“I don’t understand why,” Fetterman said, speaking on “Morning Joe” on MSNBC. “I don’t know what’s in it for you to do that whether you’re just chasing clout or you want to make it in the news or anything like that. But if you’re not willing to just support the president now and say these kinds of things, you might as well just get your MAGA hat, because you now are helping Trump with this.

He’s addressing other Democratic politicians, whom would probably be one of the last groups to not vote for Biden. He seems to think that Biden would fare better in November if Dems outright refuse to acknowledge the realities of unprecedented homelessness, Israeli war money, or being 81 years old. (Because forcing people to look to Republicans for a dissenting opinion on these subjects is a great idea.)

You should vote for Biden if you don’t want Trump, obviously. And vote for Fetterman over whomever if you don’t want whomever. But either Fetterman severely misspoke here, or his opinion goes way beyond that, and I can’t help but lose a lot of respect I had for him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I totally agree everyone needs to vote for Biden based on how the system currently works. But what I disagree with is the insinuation that anyone disagreeing with Biden needs a MAGA hat. That's tonedeaf and bad for the party.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 105 points 9 months ago (13 children)

It's news when the democrats say there's no appropriate time to critique democrats

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 69 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It should be news when someone calls himself progressive for years and as soon as he gets to congress he starts ranting about how much it pisses him off everyone thinks he's progressive.

Asshole pulled a Sinema and the most annoying part is everyone defending him because he wears a hoodie.

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

I hope it's more due to the fact that he had a stroke rather than he's doing it intentionally. Either way he has had a complete shift in personality and its disappointing to no end that he's not who he was when elected.

I'm not worried about Biden's age mostly because I think this comes from the racist fear that Kamala Harris isn't capable of running this country.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 20 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I think we’re worried about biden’s age less because we’re worried he’ll die in office and more because we’re worried he won’t and will keep running the country as his mind deteriorates beyond the point he should be running a bingo game.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

I'm far more confident of Biden surrounding himself with capable stewards, than Trump. So even if the worst happens and he stays alive but loses it like Reagan, he will at least have intelligent, relatively progressive people behind the scenes making the actual decisions.

With sundowning narcissist Trump at the wheel? Buckle the fuck in, because it's going to be a wild ride. I wouldn't worry about having to vote at the federal level again, so at least it'll help with that decision.

I really wish I could joke about this, but if Trump becomes president again, things are going to get very very dark.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I've known a couple family members who had a stroke and became better people.

Sometimes it works the other way.

Personality changes arent a rare after effect, it's pretty common.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 88 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I mean, I'm still voting for Biden over any of the Nazis on the red team, but the whole funding-a-genocide-on-gaza thing is going to make it a pretty unenthused vote.

I really wish I could vote for someone on a basis other than lesser evil.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I really wish I could vote for someone on a basis other than lesser evil.

Down-ballot exists! That's where I'm most enthusiastic about voting. There might be some places where it's just lesser evil option in some down-ballots, unfortunately, but you're more likely to have a representative that represents voters within the down-ballot which makes lesser evil choice less likely.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 64 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If valid criticism of a candidate causes someone to decide not to vote for them, then so be it. That's how democracy is supposed to work. What's important is that people vote for who they want to lead them, period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Funny how demanding unquestioned loyalty is a MAGA cultist quality.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 49 points 9 months ago (15 children)

Hey, I’m gonna be honest: his enormous about-face of political ideology (“I no longer identify as a progressive”, when, you know, him being a progressive before was a big part of why he got elected) and obvious personality changes make me extremely suspicious that his stroke permanently affected his brain in some pretty serious ways.

That’s not a derogatory comment. That’s just an observation, and strokes can absolutely have that effect on someone.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Fetterman noted during an interview an uptick in Democrats who have become more critical of Biden lately, and said it’s only helping former President Trump.

If it were closer to the election, I would definitely agree, and maybe it is too close now, although I don't think so... if it is not too close, then Biden should be criticized by Democrats who have their ear to the ground to move him towards supporting more popular policies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

'Get your MAGA hat'

He's got it backward and needs to look in the mirror.

i.e.,

There are people who defend Trump, no matter what.

and

There are people who defend Biden, no matter what.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Sure, but we also have to realize that we live in a country with a two-party system and a winner-take-all electoral college. If you're not helping your candidate, you're helping the opponent.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He's not entirely wrong. I've been critical of Biden myself, but it is because I am concerned about Biden's ability to beat Trump. I want Biden to be a stronger candidate, and a stronger leader for that matter. Criticizing Biden is the best way I know to make him to better than he's doing now. Poking holes in candidates is my love language.

But I'm a nobody. I don't make headlines when I point out his flaws. Maybe somebody somewhere will read something I wrote, or at a minimum it becomes part of the rising din of concern, and Biden is forced to make an effort to speak to my concerns. That's the best I can hope for.

I'm not backing an alternative candidate. I'm not calling for him to step aside or resign. I'm not suggesting we all throw our votes away on some long shot third party candidate. Anybody who is doing those things is helping Trump. And it's hard not to think that they don't know they are helping Trump, which makes it hard not to think that their intent is to help Trump.

So while I think Fetterman ought to be more specific with his criticism of critics, I don't disagree that there are people who fit his accusation. I also think there are far more reasonable progressives and moderates who have voiced legitimate concerns that Biden should do well to hear. Hillary ignored many of those same criticisms, to the peril of all Americans. America would be a much better place if Democrats tried harder to be more than just the lesser bad option. "At least we're not traitorous rapists" isn't a campaign slogan that inspires confidence.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's a primary. Vote for whoever you want.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Always vote for whoever you want. That's how voting works.

But know what you're voting for. Know who you're voting for. Our electoral system is inherently flawed.

Voting for some schmuck running against Biden in the primary might make you feel good about protesting one or more of Biden's policies. His support of Israel, his approach to border policies, his inaction on any number of progressive issues, whatever the objection, who else are you going to vote for? I know there is the pro-Palestine contingent in Michigan promoting a "none of the above" campaign, which is effective at registering your complaint.

But in the general election, it's time to put away such petty animus and defeat the orange monster that will destroy everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Listen, Coach Fetterman: We love your size and bombastic past but "if you aren't for us you are against us" is not the type of faux populism that is needed in 2024.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The “I’m a progressive until I’m voted into office” guy?! Nah fuck him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

What a fucking disappointment this guy is turning out to be compared to all the love he got on his campaign. Not that I'd prefer Oz by any means, but it's still pretty crushing.

I'm increasingly sure that the rising tide of never-Biden-ers is going to send Trump back into the White House. People need to be pragmatic and strategic about their voting and encourage others to do the same. So I understand WHY he felt a need to say stupid shit like this.

But if you're not allowed to criticize Biden without being banished to Siberia, then he's actually insufficiently different from Trump.

I'd bet Biden would not agree with Fetterman's message. He's not a whiny little thin-skinned gremlin the way Trump is. Based on his political career, he can even update platforms and change policy based on that feedback. So yeah, lay down the criticism to him re: Israel, he deserves it, and enough voices might actually change the foreign policy here. Do not tell the critics their votes aren't welcome. Their votes are still needed. And hopefully they're smart enough to know that NOT voting for Biden will create even worse outcomes, even while they continue clearly and loudly speaking up.

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (15 children)

I’ve said this before and got downvoted but I’ll say it again. I will not tell a Muslim person or a Palestinian that they should hold their nose and vote for Biden. If the guy in charge is actively supporting a genocide and is providing the weapons that are killing your family, friend’s family, or just someone with your same religious beliefs, I don’t think we have the right to tell them they are wrong to abstain from voting for the pro genocide of their people guy. If a president was actively supporting the Nazis in killing my people, I would not have voted for that president.

It is the candidates responsibility to listen to his constituents. Not be finger wagged into voting them.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean, what's his point we should never bitch about it when Biden does shit we don't like? I have a novel idea, maybe he should start focusing on public approval instead of you demanding that the public blindly approve of everything he does.

Yeah, I'm going to vote for him because the alternative is a bad fucking idea.

His criticism isn't out of left field He's earned this shit. It's not that he's an irredeemable president, but a significant amount of his campaign is not being Trump. And still we hope all the hell that that's enough.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I’m still on the fence about whether I can stomach knowing that I voted for the genocidal monster that can barely remember his name because he’s better than the fascist genocidal monster that wants to end whatever semblance of democracy we might have. This country is just the worst.

[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

WOULD YOU RATHER eat a chocolate bar off a public toilet seats lid.

OR WOULD YOU RATHER Eat a chocolate bar out of a public toilet bowl.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It could be worse. We could have a dictator that regulates literally everything we do. My porn is anonymous for now.

[–] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

But he's the lesser of two evils! Doesn't that get you motivated to get to the polls on November? Lesser!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

It's unfortunately nothing new, but I do think the alternative is a new level of bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

This guy turned heel pretty quickly.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 9 months ago (32 children)

While voting for Biden is the right thing to do in these circumstances, Fetterman has zero understanding of optics and apparently the oil companies got to him judging by his pro-Israel stance.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) panned Democrats who are upping their criticisms of President Biden ahead of the November election, saying they might as well don a “MAGA hat.”

Fetterman noted during an interview an uptick in Democrats who have become more critical of Biden lately, and said it’s only helping former President Trump.

Democracy! No longer allowed to question or criticize our politicians.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

Destin Sandlin, aka the Smarter Every Day guy, got some great advice from Obama about negative feedback which I think Fetterman should take to heart.

But what else would I expect from someone from York?

load more comments
view more: next ›