Also a negative percent change from previous year is a wild thing to try and visualize as being bigger than the previous year but ok.
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
458 points (98.1% liked)
Science Memes
17258 readers
571 users here now
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
- !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !arachnology@mander.xyz
- !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !biology@mander.xyz
- !biophysics@mander.xyz
- !botany@mander.xyz
- !ecology@mander.xyz
- !entomology@mander.xyz
- !fermentation@mander.xyz
- !herpetology@mander.xyz
- !houseplants@mander.xyz
- !medicine@mander.xyz
- !microscopy@mander.xyz
- !mycology@mander.xyz
- !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
- !nutrition@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
- !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
- !plantid@mander.xyz
- !plants@mander.xyz
- !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz
Physical Sciences
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !chemistry@mander.xyz
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !geography@mander.xyz
- !geospatial@mander.xyz
- !nuclear@mander.xyz
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
- !spectroscopy@mander.xyz
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
- !gardening@mander.xyz
- !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
- !soilscience@slrpnk.net
- !terrariums@mander.xyz
- !timelapse@mander.xyz
Memes
Miscellaneous
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's ok: you only get this value every two years. That way, even though it's a decrease from the previous year you have actually no idea whether the figure is higher than two years before
Oh my God I didn't even notice that... Wtf
Gotta make sure everyone is still angry about the kids smoking the devil's lettuce. Dropping numbers are highly inconvenient when you're trying to rile people up.
See also: crime statistics.
What. the. fuck.
I think this graph just gave me a migraine.
So to be clear: there is no correlation between weed use and hotdog use, other than that they're both in decline. This means that they created this graph showing two unrelated datasets for no reason other than that they could. Or, maybe, because they wanted to use the cursed image of a spliff in a hotdog bun.
THC makes you hungry, and hungry people eat hot dogs. Checkmate, atheist!
With THC everything seems more edible than it really is, even Hot Dogs.
I imagine they're trying to push an agenda of some sort
This graph is such an awful data visualization that it's almost art
I don't see the problem.
*exhales* Anybody else wanna hit this shit? It's so good.
I understand everything about this except why it exists in the first place.
First glance def had me thinking this was gonna be tampon related
I thought raw fish
What the fuck is this data trying to say?
Poop
I agree with all the comments here, but also, now I'm craving hotdogs.
I'm considering applying this to my plant science research. In response to drought stress we observed that the tree became -3 smaller marijuana. Accelerometer data reflects the impact of this change in biomass, with hotdog levels variably +2 to +5. We demonstrate that as the tree becomes smaller marijuana it also becomes bigger hotdog.
I graduated in 99. Didn't think I'd make that big of a difference.
Thought it was showing a cutaway view of fingers playing barre chords
Worst lunch ever.
Why so blunt?
God damn it. I already woke up wanting a hotdog. This is just making me hungrier.
I recognized the j right away but the hotdog bun took longer, and imagining eating a j on a hotdog bun is really disconcerting.
~~marijuana~~ Sukuna's finger dog :3
Bluntdogs