this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42468 readers
916 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's say I want to bridge from WhatsApp or telegram to Matrix, have I gaibed something in terms of privacy? In which case would it make sense? Public group chats? Direct chats?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] monovergent@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Using a bridge can sidestep telemetry that comes with official apps/clients. The services will also see a ping from your bridge server rather than, say, a direct ping from your mobile device. Make sure to self-host if you want to avoid introducing new parties to your communication stack.

This comment section is.... something.

If you host the bridges yourself, it makes no difference to privacy.

It's simply convenient to have all chats in one place ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

[โ€“] Tundra@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

matrix bridging decrypts the messages aswell, so even less privacy

[โ€“] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Wrong, bridges expand privacy, used for attack, not defence.

https://lemmy.world/comment/19823480,

WhatsApp is a scam. It never secures our messages. We do not control it, anti-libre software.

[โ€“] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago

You would be exposed on both sides, instead of just one or the other.